PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2024Ezikov svât/Ezikov svât0 citationsOpen Access

Anthropocentric Character of Phraseological Euphemisms in the Slavic Languages

View Full Paper
OVOlena A. Voytseva

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of euphemistic phraseological units used to nominate topics significant for native speakers of Slavic languages such as birth and death, the human body, age, physiology, diseases, and human vices, as well as their dynamics, semantic and functional characteristics. The studied phraseological units related to non-linguistic phenomena are part of an anthropocentric paradigm and represent a public ban on pronouncing certain nominations in a particular language group. The object of this study are verbal and nominal phraseological units in the system of Slavic languages denoting concepts, phenomena and actions replacing words prohibited for extra-linguistic reasons and having a pronounced anthropocentric character. The purpose of the work is a comparative semantic-functional analysis of phraseological euphemisms in Slavic languages. It is emphasized that phraseological euphemisms replace words denoting concepts, phenomena and actions that are considered taboo for the Slavs, whose history dates back to the distant past of the Slavic peoples. They were originally associated with religious faith, fear of the gods, supernatural beings, nature, magical thinking and the deep conviction about the interdependence between the thing and the name. Comparative semantic and functional analysis of euphemistic phraseological units reveals coincident nominations in different Slavic languages and differences in phraseological units containing standards that replace certain words and expressions denoting objects and phenomena that nowadays replace not taboo entities, but linguistic units perceived in the language collective as non-tactful, rude or vulgar.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olena A. Voytseva (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77f43b6db6435876f26c5https://doi.org/10.37708/ezs.swu.bg.v22i1.3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Communicative and pragmatic peculiarities of euphemisms in Russian and Uzbek languages2024
  2. 2Folk Linguoculture of Borderland East Slavic Ethnocontact Locus: A Lexical-Phrazeological Perspective2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH ANTHROPONYMIC COMPONENTS IN POLISH AND UKRAINIAN LANGUAGES2024
  4. 4Linguistic and cultural specificity of euphemistic gender nominations (on the material of Uzbek, Russian and English languages)2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH SOMATISMS IN THE CHEKHOV’S ARTISTIC PICTURE OF THE WORLD: UNIVERSAL AND SPECIFIC FEATURES2025