PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 20250 citationsOpen Access

A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences

View Full Paper
JSJiaxin ShenJXJinan XuHHHuiqi Hu

Key Points

  • Our benchmark establishes a structured law reasoning approach, fostering greater transparency in legal decisions.
  • The crowd-sourced dataset allows for comprehensive evaluation through structured outputs from case descriptions.
  • We introduce a framework that integrates various legal analysis tools designed to tackle the proposed task effectively.
  • This approach aims to enhance accountability in AI-assisted law systems, potentially transforming adjudication processes.

Abstract

While progress has been made in legal applications, law reasoning, crucial for fair adjudication, remains unexplored. We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience, enabling public scrutiny and preventing bias. Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision. We also create the first crowd-sourced dataset for this task, enabling comprehensive evaluation. Simultaneously, we propose an agent framework that employs a comprehensive suite of legal analysis tools to address the challenge task. This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the ``Intelligent Court''.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ecc715d1cc7436f7d18be4https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.00841
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper