Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly shape many aspects of daily life, influencing our jobs, finances, healthcare, and online content. This expansion has led to the rise of human–AI systems, where humans communicate, collaborate, or otherwise interact with AI, such as using AI outputs to make decisions. While these systems have shown potential to enhance human capabilities and improve performance on benchmarks, evidence suggests that they often underperform compared to AI‐only or human‐only approaches in experiments and real‐world applications. Here, we argue that human–AI systems should be developed with a greater emphasis on human‐centered factors—such as usability, fairness, trust, and user autonomy—within the algorithmic design and evaluation process. We advocate for integrating human‐centered principles into AI development through human‐centered algorithmic design and contextual evaluation with real users. Drawing on interdisciplinary research and our tutorial at two major AI conferences, we highlight examples and strategies for AI researchers and practitioners to embed these principles effectively. This work offers a systematic synthesis that integrates technical, practical, and ethical insights into a unified framework. Additionally, we highlight critical ethical considerations, including fairness, labor, privacy, and human agency to ensure that systems meet performance goals while serving broader societal interests. Through this work, we aim to inspire the field to embrace a truly human‐centered approach to algorithmic design and deployment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Danniell Hu
Diana Acosta-Navas
Susanne Gaube
AI Magazine
University of Michigan
University College London
University of Alberta
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/693231288e51979591dce71d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70043
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: