PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2025Chemical Physics Reviews0 citationsOpen Access

Intelligent screening of porous materials: A review of active-learning approaches in MOF research

View Full Paper
EOEtinosa OsaroYCYamil J. Colón

Key Points

  • Machine learning optimizes material behaviors, particularly for porous materials and metal-organic frameworks.
  • Active learning approach accelerates discovery while ensuring high predictive accuracy in complex material space.
  • Application of Monte Carlo simulations and molecular dynamics supports active learning in gas storage and catalysis.
  • Highlights the significance of integrating active learning into scalable workflows for efficient material design.

Abstract

The discovery and optimization of porous materials, particularly metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), are critical for advancing a range of applications, including gas storage, separation, catalysis, and energy technologies. Traditional molecular modeling methods such as Monte Carlo simulations, molecular dynamics (MD), and quantum based method such as density functional theory (DFT), has long provided valuable insights into material behavior but is often limited by high computational costs, scalability challenges, and the vast complexity of material design spaces. Machine learning has addressed some of these limitations but often requires extensive datasets, which introduce new challenges in computational efficiency. Active learning (AL) has emerged as a promising approach, offering a data-efficient framework to address these limitations. AL minimizes computational demands while maintaining high predictive accuracy by iteratively refining surrogate models and prioritizing the acquisition of the most informative data points. This review presents AL across the major tasks in MOF research: single- and multicomponent adsorption (including universal, cross-adsorbate surrogates built via alchemical-to-real transfer), diffusion and transport, electronic-structure/property prediction, experiment-in-the-loop optimization, and the training of machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs). Case studies show AL recovering full isotherms and mixture landscapes with a fraction of grand canonical Monte Carlo labels, cutting MD trajectories for diffusivity, curating balanced sets for band gaps and adsorption targets, and enabling near-DFT MLIPs that capture rare events and phase changes through enhanced-sampling or uncertainty-biased data acquisition. Looking forward, we outline a path to end-to-end discovery that couples AL with generative MOF models, graph neural networks, foundational MLIPs, and that integrates experimental feedback. Together, these advances move AL beyond label efficiency toward reliable, scalable discovery workflows for gas storage, separations, catalysis, and stability screening in MOFs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Osaro et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69402a652d562116f2901957https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0295283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Active learning graph neural networks for partial charge prediction of metal-organic frameworks via dropout Monte Carlo2024 · 32 citations
  2. 2Improving Generalization with Active Learning1994 · 1,311 citations
  3. 3Iterative experimental design based on active machine learning reduces the experimental burden associated with reaction screening2020 · 107 citations
  4. 4Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis2021 · 1,078 citations
  5. 5Harmonizing Adsorption and Diffusion in Active Learning Campaigns of Gas Separations in a MOF2025 · 7 citations