PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 21, 2025IMF Working Paper3 citationsOpen Access

Underpriced and Overused

View Full Paper
SBSimon BlackWCWeronika CelniakAHAlberto Garcia Huitron

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate fossil fuel prices and subsidies to assess their efficiency and impact on externalities.
  • Bi-annual assessment of fossil fuel prices and subsidies in 170 countries
  • Analysis of environmental externalities from fuel consumption
  • Estimation of impacts of explicit and implicit subsidies on CO2 emissions and public health
  • Explicit subsidies in 2024 totaled $725 billion, while implicit subsidies reached $6.7 trillion
  • Removing explicit subsidies could reduce CO2 emissions by 6% and avoid 70,000 premature deaths annually
  • Elimination of both subsidy types could prevent 1.1 million premature air pollution deaths and cut CO2 emissions by 46%

Abstract

This paper provides a bi-annual assessment of efficient fossil fuel prices and subsidies for 170 countries, based on a comprehensive analysis of environmental and other externalities from fuel consumption. Globally, explicit (or fiscal) subsidies were 725 billion (0. 6 percent of GDP) in 2024. Implicit subsidies, primarily underpricing of environmental costs, were 6. 7 trillion (5. 8 percent of GDP), with three quarters from underpriced air pollution and climate change. * Relative to GDP, explicit subsidies have stablized at pre-COVID levels while implicit subidies have increased somewhat and are expected to rise gradually until 2035. Explicit subsidy removal would reduce CO2 emissions by six percent below baseline levels in 2035, avoid 70, 000 premature air pollution deaths annually, raise 0. 6 percent of GDP in government revenue, and generate net economic benefits worth 0. 5 percent of GDP. Removal of both explicit and implicit subsidies (through corrective taxes) generates substantially larger benefits, such as 1. 1 million fewer premature air pollution deaths and a 46 percent reduction in CO2 emissions, but would be politically difficult. Subsidizing fuels is an inefficient way to support low-income households: for every dollar spent on explicit fuel subsidies, the poorest 20 percent of households receive just 8 cents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Black et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69473b64db9c958d0dfca816https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229034715.001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper