PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Prognostic value of KRAS exon 3, exon 4, and NRAS mutations in pathological stage III colon cancer.

View Full Paper
KYKaoru YoshikawaHOHiroki OsumiAOAkira Ooki

Key Points

  • To evaluate the clinical significance of minor RAS mutations and their prognostic value in stage III colon cancer patients.
  • Examined clinicopathological data of stage III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Assessed associations between molecular statuses of RAS, BRAF, and MSI with survival outcomes using Cox Hazard model.
  • Analyzed mutation status in a cohort of 309 patients with pathologically confirmed stage III colon cancer.
  • The study identified mutation rates of KRAS exon 2 (37.8%), minor RAS mutations (7.1%), and BRAF mutations (11.0%).
  • Three-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates varied between mutation groups, with minor RAS mutations showing favorable trends.
  • Multivariate analysis found pN2 as a significant factor for recurrence-free survival.

Abstract

224 Background: The molecular status of RAS , BRAF and MSI may serve as a biomarker for estimating survival for patients with both metastatic colorectal cancer and colon cancer (CC) undergoing curative surgery. However, there are few reports on CC patients with minor RAS mutations ( KRAS exon 3, exon 4 and NRAS , MTs), and their clinical significance remains unclear. Methods: We examined clinicopathological variables and prognosis in patients with surgically resected pathological stage III (pStage III) CC who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Associations between molecular status of RAS , BRAF and MSI including minor RAS MTs and recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) were assessed using a Cox Hazard model. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, we measured the RAS / BRAF mutation status in 2,014 patients with unresectable or resectable colorectal cancer, including recurrent cases. Of these, a total of 309 patients with pathological stage III colon cancer from the cecum to the upper rectum had their RAS / BRAF status examined, and 254 of them who received adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis. Among these patients, KRAS exon 2, minor RAS , BRAF mutations, and RAS / BRAF wild-type status were detected in 37.8%, 7.1%, 11.0%, and 44.1%, respectively. The minor RAS MTs group was MSS /pMMR in all cases and had a low prevalence of pT4 (15.8%), whereas left-sided primary tumor location (77.8%) were more common than in the other groups. Three-year RFS/OS rates were 76.7%/96.6% for the KRAS exon 2 MT group, 94.4%/94.1% for the minor RAS MTs group, 71.4%/81.8% for the BRAF MT group, and 80.9%/97.3% for the WT group, respectively. The minor RAS MTs group showed a tendency toward better RFS, though there was no significant difference when compared with the KRAS exon 2 MT group (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03–1.60; P = 0.13), the BRAF MT group (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02–1.41; P = 0.06), or the WT group (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.04–1.92; P = 0.16). Furthermore, a comparison of each minor RAS mutation variant with the KRAS exon 2 mutation showed no significant differences in RFS. In multivariate analysis, pN2 was an independent factor associated with RFS (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.46–4.41; P < 0.001) and the presence of minor RAS MTs was also a promising factor associated with RFS, though there was no significant difference (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03–1.59; P = 0.13). Conclusions: Patients with pStage III CC and minor RAS MTs exhibit distinct clinical and pathological features, with a low incidence of postoperative recurrence and potentially favorable survival outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoshikawa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e70e13bf7a6f02bff3fbhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.2_suppl.224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk factors and survival of colorectal cancer patients with RAS/BRAF gene mutations2025
  2. 2EXPLORING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF COMBINED MSI AND KRAS/BRAF MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS2026
  3. 3The Prognostic Significance of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Correlation analysis between RAS gene mutations and pathological morphological features in colorectal cancer2025
  5. 5Impact of <i>KRAS</i> sub-mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC).2026