PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-2154. A Multicenter Comparison of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection Rates After Stem Cell Transplant Among Patients Treated with Oral Vancomycin or Fidaxomicin

View Full Paper
PZPatrick T. ZambaDID. InceMCMartha L. Carvour

Key Points

  • To compare rates of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection after stem cell transplant based on treatment with vancomycin or fidaxomicin.
  • Utilized the TriNetX multicenter database for analysis.
  • Included adults ≥ 18 years old undergoing stem cell transplant.
  • Examined CDI rates based on treatment within 1 month before or after SCT.
  • rCDI rates were 10.4% with vancomycin, 8.2% with fidaxomicin, and 15.0% with both.
  • Autologous SCT resulted in 6.0% rCDI, while allogeneic SCT showed 12.9% rCDI (p<0.0001).

Abstract

Abstract Background Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) can cause severe morbidity and mortality among adults who undergo a stem cell transplant (SCT). However, past research examining rCDI after SCT has relied largely on data from single healthcare organizations (HCOs) and small sample sizes (less than 500 adults). Larger studies across HCOs are needed to inform clinical practice guidelines. Methods Using the TriNetX multicenter database, rCDI rates were examined among adults treated for CDI near the time of their SCT. Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: (1) ≥ 18 years old; (2) SCT between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2024; (3) any CDI diagnosis within 1 month before or after the SCT; and (4) any prescription for oral vancomycin and/or fidaxomicin within 1 month before or after the SCT. rCDI rates between 3-12 months after the SCT were estimated among patients who received oral vancomycin only, fidaxomicin only, or both (e.g., sequential use for recurrent or refractory CDI) during the CDI episode near the time of the SCT. rCDI rates for autologous and allogeneic SCT were also compared. Results Of 1,733 patients with a CDI episode near the time of their SCT, 1,464 (84.5%) from 44 HCOs received oral vancomycin only, 122 (7.0%) from 24 HCOs received fidaxomicin only, and 147 (8.5%) from 25 HCOs received both agents during the 2-month window surrounding the SCT. rCDI was documented among 10.4% (n=152) of patients who received oral vancomycin only, compared to 8.2% (n=10) for those who received fidaxomicin only and 15.0% (n= 22) among patients who received both (p=0.15). rCDI was less frequent among patients who received autologous SCT (6.0%) compared to those who received allogeneic SCT (12.9%) (p 0.0001). Conclusion Overall, rCDI rates were lowest among patients who were only treated with fidaxomicin during the CDI episode near the time of the SCT and among patients who underwent autologous SCT. However, patients from 44 HCOs received oral vancomycin only while patients from 24 HCOs received fidaxomicin only; and reliable information about prophylactic use of oral vancomycin was not available. Further research is warranted to determine the role of system-level practice variations and patient-level factors on rCDI after a SCT. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zamba et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e71813bf7a6f02bff6cahttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2317
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper