PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-534. Comparison of Concurrent (Same or Next-Day) Conventional Microbial Testing to Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Results: Review of Pediatric Samples over 4-Years (2020-2024)

View Full Paper
KCKathleen CondonJSJ. SchieffelinMGMedea Gabriel

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of Next Generation Sequencing and conventional microbial testing in diagnosing infections in pediatric cases.
  • Evaluated 271 plasma NGS samples over 4 years
  • Compared results of conventional tests to NGS conducted concurrently or the next day
  • Excluded certain sample types and positive NGS paired with negative blood cultures.
  • High concordance was observed between NGS and viral plasma PCR for adenovirus
  • NGS effectively detected all cases of adenovirus and several other viruses at adequate PCR levels
  • NGS identified bacteremia well, but missed multiple bacterial infections in non-blood cultures.

Abstract

Abstract Background The role NGS has in diagnosis of infections remains unclear as high costs currently limit use. Strengths and limitations of this testing modality are still being studied. Methods 271 plasma NGS (Karius Test ®) samples over 4 years were evaluated for the presence of conventional microbial testing occurring within one day. There were 68 instances for comparison (average 20.6 hours apart). Wound, non-BAL respiratory, stool and bacterial urine cultures were excluded. Positive NGS paired to negative blood culture were also excluded. Results Viral: There was high concordance between NGS and viral plasma PCR (Table 1, Figure 1). When PCR viral load was above the threshold of quantification NGS successfully detected all cases of adenovirus, CMV, EBV, HSV1, and HHV6 (n=22). NGS detected CMV when PCR did not once. Viral PCR detection below the level of quantification (n=10) always corresponded to negative NGS. BK virus detection was variable. Twice PCR detected BK above quantification (139 and 9,530 copies/ml) but NGS did not. NGS detected BK once when it was undetected by PCR. Viral infections in other body compartments were inconsistently detected by NGS (Table 2). Bacterial: All positive blood cultures corresponded to positive NGS except two cases of staphylococcus epidermidis, likely contaminants. NGS identified Staphylococcus epidermidis when Staphylococcus haemolyticus grew from culture. Most (5/6) cases of bacteria cultured from other body sites were missed by NGS although only two cases had greater than rare growth (Table 3). Fungal: NGS did not detect dimorphic fungi in five instances of Blastomyces or Histoplasma antigen positivity. NGS failed to detect Cryptococcus neoformans fungemia and Rhizopus with dermal angioinvasion. NGS identified invasive fungal infections unable to be cultured twice (Rhizopus, Aspergillus). Conclusion Plasma NGS detected viruses when above the threshold for quantification but not when below the limit of quantification. BK virus had variable detection. NGS identified bacteremia well. A positive blood culture with negative NGS suggests contamination and favors antibiotic de-escalation. Detection of bacterial infections outside the bloodstream is unreliable. Dimorphic fungi and Cryptococcus were not detected by NGS, while Candida and molds were. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Condon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e73f13bf7a6f02bffd84https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.749
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical efficacy of plasma cell-free DNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing bloodstream infections2026
  2. 2Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnostics in Pediatric Patients with Malignancies or After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3P-1993. Investigating Perspectives of Next-generation Sequencing Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Testing2026
  4. 4Metagenomic next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool in the clinical routine of an infectious diseases department: a retrospective cohort study2024 · 13 citations
  5. 5P-1988. Prediction of Clinically-Significant Infections among Stem Cell Transplant Patients Using Next-Generation Sequencing Surveillance2026