PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Public humanities.0 citationsOpen Access

Literary-Public Entanglements in Postcolonial Sri Lanka: Challenges, Possibilities, and Potentialities

View Full Paper
HRHarshana Rambukwella

Key Points

  • The central research question explores the interplay between literary and political forces in shaping Sri Lankan identity.
  • Critical analysis of the historical literary-cultural discourse in Sri Lanka from the early twentieth century to the present.
  • Examination of different visions of Sri Lankan identity in the literary-public sphere.
  • Analysis of the influence of colonial and postcolonial political economies on cultural expression.
  • Identified a bifurcated literary-cultural public sphere in Sri Lanka influenced by colonialism and majoritarian politics.
  • Demonstrated that the literary and political realms mutually shape public engagement in cultural identity.
  • Found that literary public engagement is contingent, reflecting both progressive and regressive ideologies.

Abstract

Abstract This essay traces the emergence of a linguistically and culturally bifurcated public literary-cultural sphere in Sri Lanka from the early twentieth century to the postcolonial present. It looks at key “moments” in the history of literary-cultural public discourse and argues that different visions of what a Sri Lankan identity could be jostled for influence. However, the colonial political economy under which this literary-cultural sphere developed, and the ensuing majoritarian political developments in post-independence Sri Lanka, overdetermined the linguistically and culturally segregated “form” this literary-public sphere eventually developed. Through the critical exploration of this history, this essay demonstrates that the literary and the political imaginations reproduce each other and that the literary-cultural public sphere is best understood as a contingent space shaped by ideological and political forces that can be both progressive and regressive rather than a normatively progressive or “open” space of public engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harshana Rambukwella (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e73f13bf7a6f02bffdc9https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2025.10096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper