PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-914. Comparison of Linezolid and Contezolid Exposure on Platelet Levels in ICU Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
YZYuxin ZuoJLJingyi LiangZCZ. J. Chen

Key Points

  • To compare the effects of contezolid and linezolid on platelet levels in ICU patients.
  • Retrospective cohort study in ICU patients from Nanfang Hospital
  • Included patients received at least 3 days of contezolid or linezolid
  • Logistic regression models and inverse probability of treatment weighting used to analyze outcomes.
  • 197 patients included; 62 received contezolid and 135 received linezolid
  • Thrombocytopenia incidence was lower in contezolid group (32.3%) versus linezolid group (54.8%)
  • After IPTW adjustment, contezolid showed significantly lower thrombocytopenia risk (OR 0.48, P = 0.034)
  • Clinical efficacy rate was higher in contezolid group (84.5%) compared to linezolid (59.9%)

Abstract

Abstract Background Linezolid is often associated with the development of thrombocytopenia. Previous studies have demonstrated that contezolid, a novel oxazolidinone, exhibits favorable efficacy in treating infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. This study aimed to compare the effects of contezolid and linezolid exposure on platelet levels in ICU patients. Figure 1. Flow diagram of patient selectionFigure 1.Flow diagram of patient selection Methods This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine at Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China), from March 2023 to December 2024. Patients who received at least 3 days of contezolid or linezolid therapy were included. Logistic regression models were used to compare the incidence of thrombocytopenia, a reduction of greater than 30% from the baseline platelet count, between the two groups. To mitigate confounding bias in observational data, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics, followed by outcome analysis. Results A total of 197 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 62 receiving contezolid and 135 receiving linezolid. Significant differences were observed between the groups in age (67.6 vs. 57.5 years, P 0.001) and baseline platelet levels (164.0 vs. 218.0, P = 0.037). The incidence of thrombocytopenia in the contezolid group was lower than that in the linezolid group (32.3% vs 54.8%). However, logistic regression analysis showed that the difference between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.25-1.01, P = 0.058). After adjusting for confounding factors by IPTW, regression analysis showed that the risk of thrombocytopenia in the contezolid group was lower than that in the linezolid group, and the difference was statistically significant (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.24-0.93, P = 0.034). Additionally, the contezolid group demonstrated a higher clinical efficacy rate than the linezolid group in the weighted cohort (84.5% vs. 59.9%, OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.5-8.58, P = 0.006). Conclusion In ICU patients, contezolid exposure was associated with a lower incidence of thrombocytopenia and higher clinical efficacy compared to linezolid. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zuo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31d13bf7a6f02c00cc5https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper