PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026National Institute Economic Review0 citationsOpen Access

The Economic and the Political: Rethinking Their Relationship

View Full Paper
JMJohn Milbank

Key Points

  • To explore the relationship between economic and political spheres and the implications for social representation.
  • Conceptual analysis of theories by Hobbes and their impact on the liberal order.
  • Examination of the constructs of private and public matters in economy and polity.
  • Discussion on corporatism and its variations in societal context.
  • Identified contradiction in separating economic and political spheres.
  • Proposed that good corporatism prioritizes social representation over individualistic models.
  • Squeezing of socially relational groups leads to inadequate representation in governance.

Abstract

Abstract The liberal order, as first articulated by Hobbes, depends upon an unnatural disembedding of both the economy and the polity from society. The economic and the political are keep apart. While the economy is seen as a private matter, the polity is conceived as a public one. The socially relational and mediating groups are squeezed out. Yet this involves contradiction. Is property primarily a matter of primary seizure or legal underwriting? Either the economic captures the political or vice-versa. A bad corporatism follows. The only alternative is a good corporatism recognising the priority of the social, of groups and their representation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John Milbank (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31d13bf7a6f02c00d48https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2025.10081
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper