PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Flow0 citationsOpen Access

Simulating the urban canopy’s impact on wind-driven natural ventilation

View Full Paper
NBNicholas BachandHSHesam SalehipourCGCatherine Gorlé

Key Points

  • Investigate how urban canopy affects wind-driven natural ventilation in buildings.
  • Conducted large eddy simulations for outdoor and indoor airflow.
  • Examined how urban canopy density and wind angles affect ventilation rates through various configurations.
  • Utilized flow visualisations to observe wind patterns and interference effects.
  • Ventilation rates varied between 50%-85% based on configuration and canopy density.
  • Lower density canopies generally provided higher ventilation rates.
  • Wind angles favoring direct paths between openings enhanced ventilation efficiency.

Abstract

Abstract The urban canopy affects wind in complex ways, making it challenging to predict wind-driven natural ventilation and cooling in buildings. Using large eddy simulations of coupled outdoor and indoor airflow, we study how the surrounding urban canopy and wind angle influence ventilation rates through four ventilation configurations: cross, corner, dual-room and single-sided. Flow visualisations demonstrate how both large-scale flow patterns and local interference effects can influence ventilation rates by 50 %–85 %. In general, lower density canopies give higher ventilation rates, and wind angles that align with a direct path between two openings also lead to higher ventilation rates. However, interference effects from surrounding buildings can significantly change the local wind speed and direction, thus also changing ventilation rates. The magnitude of these interference effects depends on both the wind angle and surrounding building geometries. The effect of wind angle is less pronounced in a higher density canopy, where the urban canopy geometry more strongly guides the flow. The results demonstrate that the canopy’s effect on ventilation rates is much more complex than those suggested by existing natural ventilation parametrisations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bachand et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31d13bf7a6f02c00d53https://doi.org/10.1017/flo.2025.10039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LES of ABL flow in the built-environment using roughness modeled by fractal surfaces2015 · 21 citations
  2. 2A wind tunnel study of the mean pressure forces acting on large groups of low-rise buildings1980 · 127 citations
  3. 3Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness2015 · 204 citations
  4. 4Inter-scale energy transfer and interaction in a turbulent channel flow with randomly distributed wall roughness2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5Novel Geometric Parameters for Assessing Flow Over Realistic Versus Idealized Urban Arrays2023 · 31 citations