PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

Biomarkers for Predicting Malignant Transformation of Premalignant Lesions of the Larynx: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
JRJuan P. RodrigoRLReydson Alcides De Lima-SouzaFLF. Lopez

Key Points

  • This work aims to identify biomarkers that predict malignant transformation of premalignant laryngeal lesions to enhance patient management.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant studies.
  • Included studies examining biomarkers for histopathologically confirmed premalignant laryngeal lesions.
  • Assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool.
  • 11 studies met inclusion criteria, involving 730 patients.
  • Identified diverse biomarker categories: protein markers, immune markers, microRNAs, and genetic markers.
  • Most studies showed moderate to serious risk of bias primarily due to limited confounder control.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Premalignant laryngeal lesions carry a variable risk of malignant transformation to squamous cell carcinoma. Identifying reliable biomarkers that predict malignant transformation could improve patient management and surveillance strategies. The objective of this work is to perform a systematic review of the literature on biomarkers that predict malignant transformation of premalignant laryngeal lesions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between January 2011 and November 2025. Studies investigating biomarkers that predict malignant transformation of histopathologically confirmed premalignant laryngeal lesions were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: From 166 initially identified records, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 730 patients. These studies investigated diverse biomarker categories such as protein markers (cortactin, FAK, NANOG, SOX2, CSPG4), immune markers (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immune gene signatures), microRNAs (miR-183-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-106b-3p), and genetic markers (chromosomal instability, PIK3CA amplification and mutations, FGFR3 mutations). Five studies provided adequate follow-up data on transformation outcomes. Most studies showed a moderate to serious risk of bias primarily due to limited confounder control and incomplete reporting. Conclusions: While several promising biomarker candidates have been identified, the evidence base remains limited due to small sample sizes, heterogeneous methodologies, and inadequate follow-up data. Cortactin/FAK protein expression and immune signatures are the most promising but require validation in larger, well-designed prospective cohorts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodrigo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f32713bf7a6f02c00f07https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020236
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Combined PIK3CA and SOX2 Gene Amplification Predicts Laryngeal Cancer Risk beyond Histopathological Grading2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Cortactin and Focal Adhesion Kinase as Predictors of Cancer Risk in Patients with Laryngeal Premalignancy2011 · 39 citations
  3. 3ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions2016 · 20,052 citations
  4. 4A Novel Role For Nanog As An Early Cancer Risk Marker In Patients With Laryngeal Precancerous Lesions2017 · 43 citations
  5. 5Chromosome instability predicts progression of premalignant lesions of the larynx2014 · 24 citations