PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-624. Serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Clinical Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients in Louisville, Kentucky

View Full Paper
FAForest W. ArnoldLPLeslie A ParrishSMSubathra Marimuthu

Key Points

  • This research examines the relationship between Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.
  • Secondary analysis of patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia
  • Serotype identified through Quellung reaction and PCR
  • Data collected on demographics and clinical factors including vaccination status
  • Clinical outcomes compared by serotype and vaccine coverage
  • Trend analysis of hospital stay, bacteremia, organ failure, and mortality.
  • 191 patients were assessed, with varying serotype coverage by PCV-20 and PCV-21 vaccines.
  • Both PCV-20 and PCV-21 serotypes showed comparable clinical severity.
  • Unvaccinated individuals exhibited trends towards worse outcomes in clinical stability and mortality rates
  • PCV-21 serotypes had a higher rate of bacteremia and organ failure compared to PCV-20.

Abstract

Abstract Background Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 3, 6A, 6B, 9N and 19F often cause severe disease. The pneumococcal conjugate vaccines PCV-20 and PCV-21 cover 10 shared serotypes, along with 10 and 11 additional unique serotypes, respectively. The association between serotype coverage and severity of disease remains poorly understood. Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae Among Hospitalized Patients Methods This was a secondary analysis of patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia. Serotype was determined by Quellung reaction and PCR. Demographics were collected, including vaccination status, as well as time to clinical stability, length of stay, bacteremia (invasive disease), organ failure and mortality. Patients were grouped by serotype and categorized based on PCV-20 or PCV-21 vaccine serotype. Clinical outcomes were compared between each group. For the PCV-20 serotype category, clinical outcomes were also compared by vaccination status. Results A total of 191 patients were included: 89 (47%) had a serotype covered by the PCV-20 vaccine and 151 (70%) had a serotype covered by the PCV-21 vaccine. Of the 89 patients with PCV-20 serotypes, 13 (15%) were unique to the PCV-20 vaccine, and of the 151 patients with PCV-21 serotypes, 83 (55%) were unique to the PCV-21 vaccine. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between unique serotype categories; however, PCV-20 serotypes tended to result in longer time to stability (5.5 vs. 4 days) and hospital stay (16 vs. 8 days), while PCV-21 serotypes showed a trend toward higher rates of bacteremia (25% vs. 11%), organ failure (69% vs. 67%), and mortality (19% vs. 11%). Among those with any serotype covered by the PCV-20 vaccine, clinical outcomes did not differ significantly by vaccination status, though unvaccinated individuals showed non-significant trends toward worse outcomes—longer time to stability (5 vs. 4 days), length of stay (8 vs. 5 days), and higher mortality (13% vs. 11%). Conclusion More patients had a serotype covered by a unique serotype of PCV-21 vaccine than PCV-20 vaccine, but clinical severity was comparable. Among the PCV-20 vaccine group, vaccination status did not result in significant improvement in outcomes. However, observed trends suggest potential variations in disease severity that warrant further investigation. Disclosures Forest W. Arnold, DO, MSc, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Leslie A. Parrish, Ph.D., Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Subathra Marimuthu, MS, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Vidyulata Salunkhe, MBBS, MPH, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Daniya Sheikh, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Nataly Pazmino, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Jafir Wakeel, MBBS, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Girish Madishetty, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Hamza Mehmood, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Spozhmai Hewadmai, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Biplab Adhikari, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Hassan Cheema, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Hussnain Cheema, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Imad Majeed, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Steven Gootee, MHI, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support T'shura Ali, PhD, MPH, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arnold et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33213bf7a6f02c01063https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.837
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper