PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

AI-Assisted Double-Headed Capsule Endoscopy: Multicentre Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study Across Small Bowel Indications

View Full Paper
KMKamran MushtaqLYLim YjLLLuca De Luca

Key Points

  • To assess the diagnostic performance and reading efficiency of AI-assisted double-headed capsule endoscopy for small bowel indications.
  • Multicentre prospective study conducted at two UK centers
  • 242 patients underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy for various indications
  • Videos reviewed by seven experienced readers in standard and AI-assisted modes
  • AI-assisted reading sensitivity was 95.3% and specificity was 96.5%
  • Standard reading sensitivity was 96.5% and specificity was 85.3%
  • AI-assisted reading time decreased by 52%, from 38.1 min to 18.26 min

Abstract

Background/Aims: Double-headed capsule endoscopy enhances visualization and diagnostic yield in small bowel evaluation but increases reading time. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted double-headed capsule endoscopy (MiroCam MC2000) across all small bowel indications and to compare its reading efficiency with the standard manual reading mode. Methods: From May to December 2023, 242 consecutive patients (mean age 50.17 years, SD 18.3; 53% female) underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy at two UK centres for suspected Crohn’s disease (48.8%), iron-deficiency anemia (23.6%), bleeding (18.6%), or other (9%). Seven experienced readers reviewed videos in standard mode (blinded to clinical data), then AI-assisted (MiroCam AI Scan) methods were applied after de-identification/randomization. Two experts provided reference standards. No adverse events occurred. Results: AI-assisted reading had sensitivity 95.3% (95% CI 90.1–98.3%) and specificity 96.5% (95% CI 91.3–99.0%) for diagnostic findings, vs. standard reading: 96.5% (95% CI 91.2–99.0%) and 85.3% (95% CI 78.0–90.9%). The positive findings rate was 83.6% vs. 80.2% (p = 0.040). Reading time decreased by 52% (38.1 vs. 18.26 min; p < 0.001). Conclusions: AI-assisted reading offers high diagnostic accuracy, superior specificity and reduced reading times, supporting its adjunctive role with expert oversight. Registered: ERGO ID 82419.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mushtaq et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33213bf7a6f02c010e3https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020239
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper