PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Lara D. Veeken0 citationsOpen Access

The immune cell landscape analyzed by imaging mass cytometry in the muscle of patients with inclusion body myositis associated or not with Sjögren’s disease

View Full Paper
BQBaptiste QuéréABAmélie BourhisPHPatrice Hémon

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the inflammatory infiltrates between inclusion body myositis patients with and without Sjögren’s disease.
  • Analyzed muscle biopsies from IBM patients with and without SjD using imaging mass cytometry.
  • Conducted multiplex immunostaining with 34 markers to evaluate inflammatory infiltrates.
  • Performed both supervised and unsupervised comparative analyses.
  • No statistically significant difference found between IBM-SjD and sIBM groups, yet trends noted.
  • IBM-SjD showed a broader inflammatory infiltrate surface median of 4.8% compared to 1.6% in sIBM.
  • Higher proportions of plasma cells and B cells were observed in IBM-SjD patients.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Several studies reported an association between Sjögren’s disease (SjD) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). However, the potential specificities of IBM when associated with SjD have been poorly investigated. Here, we compared the muscular inflammatory infiltrates between IBM patients with or without associated SjD. Materials and methods Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded muscle biopsies of patients with IBM, associated with SjD (IBM-SjD) and sporadic (sIBM) forms, from 6 French expert centers, were collected. Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) multiplex immunostaining (34 markers) was used to quantify and analyze inflammatory infiltrate composition. Supervised and unsupervised descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. Results Fourteen IBM-SjD and 7 sIBM muscle samples were analyzed. No statistically significant difference was encountered but some trends were pointed. IBM-SjD samples had a broader inflammatory infiltrate surface (median 4.8%, IQR: 1.4–8.6) than sIBM samples (median 1.6% IQR: 1.2–2.4). In both groups, the main inflammatory cells in muscle infiltrate were primarily macrophages and T cells. However, the proportion of plasma cells (14.7% IQR: 5.4–24.6 vs 8.5% IQR: 4.6–9.8) and B cells (3.1% IQR: 0.4–5.6 vs 0.5% IQR: 0.0–3.2) were higher in IBM-SjD patients. Conclusion Using IMC on muscle biopsies, IBM-SjD and sIBM patients share common histological features, but there are notable distinctions (more extensive infiltrate, high numbers of B cells and plasma cells in IBM-SjD). These observations were exploratory and based on a small number of patients. but may suggest IBM-SjD has distinct SjD-related pathophysiology compared with sIBM, and open to further research with potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quéré et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33b13bf7a6f02c01229https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper