PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Urologia Journal0 citations

No screening, no life: Perspectives from a sociodemographic characterization of prostate cancer patients

View Full Paper
LCLucas J. CortésGOGerman OlayaJCJ. Elena Cortés

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify clinical and sociodemographic features affecting mortality and metastasis in prostate cancer patients.
  • Analyzed clinical and sociodemographic data of 590 prostate cancer patients from 2020 to 2023.
  • Categorized patients into living and deceased groups, assessing PSA levels and risk classifications.
  • Performed statistical analyses to explore associations with mortality and metastasis.
  • Survivors had significantly higher PSA screening rates (66.9%) compared to deceased patients (22.0%; p < 0.001).
  • Median PSA was significantly higher in patients who died (123 ng/mL) than in survivors (16 ng/mL; p < 0.001).
  • PSA > 100 ng/mL correlated with ~50% metastatic probability; over 95% for PSA > 323 ng/mL.
  • High-risk D’Amico classification was linked to increased risk of metastasis (RR 6.67) and mortality (OR 14.24; p < 0.001).
  • Bone pain was a key symptom in the deceased group (76.1%) and closely associated with metastasis (RR 8.146).

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common solid neoplasm in men, with an increasing incidence. This study describes clinical and sociodemographic features and PSA levels, and evaluate their associations with stage, risk categories, metastasis, and mortality in a public tertiary hospital in southern Colombia. Methodology: The present retrospective cohort study included 590 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2020 and 2023. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, PSA levels, pathological characteristics and risk scales were analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: living ( n = 429) and deceased by prostate cancer ( n = 109), and other causes ( n = 44). Statistical analyses were performed to determine associations with mortality and presence of metastasis. Results: PSA screening was more frequent among survivors (66.9%, n = 287) than among deceased (22.0%, n = 24; p 100 ng/mL was associated with ~50% probability of metastatic disease, rising to >95% for PSA > 323 ng/mL. High-risk D’Amico classification was strongly associated with metastasis (RR 6.67) and mortality (OR 14.24, p < 0.001). Bone pain was the predominant presenting symptom in the deceased group (76.1%, n = 83) and showed a strong association with metastasis (RR 8.146). Conclusions: PSA screening was strongly associated with improved survival outcomes. Elevated PSA levels, high risk D’Amico classification and the presence of bone pain were important predictors of metastasis and mortality. The need to strengthen early detection in our population is evident, given the high percentage of patients presenting at advanced stages.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cortés et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696719a7c0d1e3cfbfce90b6https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603251412607
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sociodemographic and Clinicopathologic Features of Prostate Cancer Patients Accessing Technetium-99 Bone Scan Service in Ghana – A Cross-Sectional Study2025
  2. 2Prostate cancer: screening and early detection2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Determinants of Survival and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis (2009-2018)2024
  4. 4Comparing overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer using PSA levels: A multivariate analysis using a national database.2024
  5. 5Survival and Mortality Predictors in Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort of 10 556 Brazilian Patients2026