PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 16, 2026Translational Behavioral Medicine0 citations

Position statement: the Society of Behavioral Medicine supports retaining funding for school meals to reduce hunger and food insecurity in American children

View Full Paper
JBJoanna BuscemiMTMary TakgbajouahEBElise Betkowski

Key Points

  • The aim is to highlight the importance of funding school meal programs to combat food insecurity among children.
  • Position statement from the Society of Behavioral Medicine advocating for policy changes.
  • Urging Congress to restore funding for specific food assistance programs.
  • Calling for co-sponsorship of the No Hungry Kids in Schools Act to expand meal access.
  • Recommending codification of nutrition standards from the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.
  • Funding reductions have limited access to healthy meals for low-income students.
  • Disproportionate impacts on marginalized communities have increased food insecurity and stigma.
  • Strengthening school meal programs is linked to improved child health and academic performance.

Abstract

Abstract Millions of children across the United States rely on school meals as a primary source of daily nutrition. Access to healthy meals improves diet quality, reduces hunger, and supports better attendance and academic performance. Recent federal actions, however, have threatened the reach and quality of these programs. Funding reductions have limited schools’ ability to purchase fresh, locally sourced foods and have made universal free meals harder to provide. These changes disproportionately affect students from low-income and historically marginalized communities, increasing food insecurity, stigma, and meal debt. The Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) urges Congress to restore funding for the Local Food for Schools and Local Food Purchase Assistance programs, which help schools and food banks provide fresh, locally produced foods. We also call on lawmakers to co-sponsor the No Hungry Kids in Schools Act to expand universal free meal access and simplify eligibility requirements. Finally, SBM recommends codifying the key nutrition standards from the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act into law to protect them from administrative or political changes. These measures would ensure reliable nutrition for all students, reduce hunger and meal debt, support local agriculture, and promote equity. Strengthening school meal programs is an evidence-based strategy to improve child health, enhance academic outcomes, and support social and educational equity nationwide.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buscemi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6969d428940543b977709136https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper