PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 16, 2026Applied Sciences5 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning-Based Cyber Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Resampling Methods for Imbalanced Credit Card Data

View Full Paper
EBEyad BtoushTKThaeer KobbaeyHTHatem Tamimi

Key Points

  • This research aims to predict and detect instances of credit card cyber fraud using various ML techniques.
  • Employed machine learning techniques: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, XGBoost, and CatBoost.
  • Utilized sampling methods such as Tomek Link, SMOTE, Edited Nearest Neighbor, Tomek+ENN, and SMOTE+ENN.
  • Conducted a comparative analysis to assess the performance of algorithms based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and ROC-AUC.
  • Performance metrics were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of each machine learning model for fraud detection.
  • Results indicated variations in accuracy and effectiveness among the different algorithms in identifying fraud.

Abstract

The prevalence of online transactions and extensive adoption of credit card payments have contributed to the escalation of credit card cyber fraud in modern society. These trends are propelled by technological advancements, which provide fraudulent actors with more opportunities. Fraudsters exploit victims’ financial vulnerabilities by obtaining illegal access to sensitive credit card information through deceptive means, such as phishing, fraudulent phone calls, and fraudulent SMS messages. This study predicts and detects potential instances of cyber fraud in credit card transactions by employing Machine Learning (ML) techniques, including Decision Tree (DT); Random Forest (RF); Logistic Regression (LR); Support Vector Machine (SVM); K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN); XGBoost; CatBoost; and sampling techniques such as Tomek Link, Synthetic Minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), Edited Nearest Neighbor (ENN), Tomek+ENN, and SMOTE+ENN. To determine the performance of the algorithms in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and ROC-AUC for credit card cyber fraud detection, we conducted a comparative analysis of the extant ML techniques.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Btoush et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6969d4dc940543b977709c40https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020850
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper