PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Regional Disparities in Artificial Intelligence Development and Green Economic Efficiency Performance Under Its Embedding: Empirical Evidence from China

View Full Paper
ZLZiyang LiZHZ. HuangSZS.Y. Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the relationship between artificial intelligence development and green economic efficiency across Chinese provinces.
  • Applied entropy weight TOPSIS method to measure AI development levels.
  • Used DEA-BCC model to assess green economic efficiency.
  • Conducted spatial analysis to identify agglomeration patterns.
  • Classified provinces into four categories based on AI and green efficiency levels.
  • Found a significant negative correlation between AI development and green economic efficiency.
  • Identified high-high agglomerations for AI in the Yangtze River Delta and Shandong.
  • Observed green economic efficiency clustering in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and select western provinces.
  • Outlined four provincial categories, each with different policy needs.

Abstract

This study analyzes artificial intelligence development and green economic efficiency across 31 Chinese provinces using 2019–2021 panel data. We apply the entropy weight TOPSIS method to measure AI development levels. The entropy weight TOPSIS method measures AI development levels, the DEA-BCC model assesses green economic efficiency, and their coordination types are identified. Findings reveal a significant negative correlation between AI development and green economic efficiency. We explain this complex relationship through three mechanisms: short-term polarization effects, technology conversion lags, and spatial spillovers. Spatial analysis shows AI development forms high-high agglomerations in the Yangtze River Delta and Shandong. Green economic efficiency shows high-high clustering in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and selected western provinces. Using a “two-system” coupling framework, we identify four provincial categories. The “double-high” type should function as growth poles. The “high-low” type requires improved technology conversion efficiency. The “low-high” type can leverage ecological advantages. The “double-low” type needs enhanced factor inputs. We propose three targeted policy recommendations: establishing digital-green synergy platforms, implementing inter-provincial AI resource collaboration mechanisms, and developing locally adapted action plans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b25cfd2a12237a934919bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18020884
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper