PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

A National Evaluation of Upper Extremity Weightlifting Injury Surveillance: The High Risk in Youth and Adults With an Underutilization in Older Adults

View Full Paper
PLPhilip M. LeeJUJackson UnderhillCNCameron Nishida

Key Points

  • Evaluate trends in upper extremity injuries related to weightlifting across different age groups.
  • Utilized National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database from 2021-2024.
  • Included patients presenting to emergency departments with upper extremity weightlifting injuries.
  • Stratified patients into four age groups: pediatric, young adult, middle-age, and geriatric.
  • Applied chi-square tests and regression analyses to assess associations between age groups.
  • Analyzed 3189 upper extremity weightlifting injuries nationally estimated at 127,667.
  • Most common injuries were sprain/strain (26.2%) and fracture/crush/avulsion (15.8%).
  • Injuries predominantly affected the shoulder (33.8%) and finger (28.1%).
  • Pediatric patients were 2.5 times more likely to sustain finger injuries compared to other groups.

Abstract

Background: Weightlifting improves physical fitness; however, injuries can lead to impaired functionality and long-term complications. Data on weightlifting-related injuries are limited. Purpose: To evaluate the epidemiologic trends of weightlifting-associated upper extremity injuries, further stratified by age. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiologic study. Methods: This analysis used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database, including all patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a primary upper extremity weightlifting injury between 2021 and 2024. Outcomes included patient demographic characteristics, final diagnosis, primary body region injured, and mechanism of injury (MOI). Patients were stratified into 4 age groups: pediatric (<18 years), young adult (18-39 years), middle-age (40-64 years), and geriatric (≥65 years). Chi-square tests and post hoc comparisons were used to evaluate categorical variables. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between age groups. Statistical significance was predetermined at <.05. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3189 upper extremity weightlifting injuries (national estimate NE = 127,667) were analyzed. Across all ages, sprain/strain (NE = 36,054; 26.2%), fracture/crush/avulsion (NE = 22,388; 15.8%), and laceration/puncture (NE = 9020; 7.2%) were the most common diagnoses. Injuries most frequently involved the shoulder (NE = 45,825; 33.8%), finger (NE = 32,398; 28.1%), and upper arm (NE = 7827; 8.8%). The most common MOIs were drop/crush injuries (NE = 34,757; 30.1%), pulling movements (NE = 14,232; 10.5%), and overhead movements (NE = 11,110; 8.3%). Pediatric patients were 2.5 times more likely to sustain finger injuries (odds ratio OR, 2.536; 95% CI, 2.191-2.935; P < .001) and injuries from drop/crush mechanisms (OR, 2.484; 95% CI, 2.166-2.849; P < .001) compared with all other age groups. The geriatric age group was 2 times more likely to sustain injuries from pushing movements (OR, 2.037; 95% CI, 1.326-3.130; P < .001) compared with all other age groups. Conclusion: Sprain/strain and fracture/crush/avulsion were frequent upper extremity weightlifting injuries, often secondary to drop/crush injuries and overhead movements. Pediatric athletes were more likely to sustain finger and drop/crush injuries, whereas shoulder injuries affected all adult age groups. The low proportion of geriatric weightlifters suggests there may be underuse of a sport effective in combating osteoporosis. These insights into overall and age-specific injury patterns can help shape evidence-based recommendations to reduce the overall injury burden and promote safe resistance training.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b25cfd2a12237a93491b9https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251387730
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper