Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide low-cost, liquid access to broad equity and fixed-income exposures, including rapidly growing Asian and Asia-focused markets. Yet the academic evidence on Asian ETF portfolio construction remains fragmented, often limited to narrow country samples and centered on mean–variance trade-offs and standard performance statistics, with comparatively less emphasis on downside tail risk and on implementable long-only versus long–short designs under leverage constraints. This study examines the performance and risk characteristics of 29 Asian and Asia-focused ETFs over 2014–2025 and evaluates whether optimization using variance-based and tail-sensitive risk measures improves portfolio outcomes relative to a simple, implementable benchmark. We construct Markowitz mean–variance and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) efficient frontiers and implement six optimized portfolios at the 95% and 99% tail levels under long-only and long–short configurations with leverage up to 30%. Performance is evaluated relative to an equally weighted Asian ETF benchmark using the Sharpe ratio and tail-sensitive measures, including the Rachev ratio and the stable tail adjusted return (STARR), complemented by fat-tail diagnostics based on the Hill tail-index estimator. The empirical results show that optimization improves efficiency relative to equal weighting in risk-adjusted terms and that moderate leverage can increase returns but typically amplifies volatility, dispersion, and drawdowns. Taken together, the evidence indicates that risk-measure choice materially affects portfolio composition and realized outcomes, with tail-based optimization generally producing more robust allocations than mean–variance approaches when downside risk is a primary concern.
Divelgama et al. (2026) studied this question.