PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026The Medical Journal of Australia0 citationsOpen Access

Health Impairment Notifications About Doctors to the Australian Medical Regulator, 2012–2022: A Retrospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
MBMarie M. BismarkDHDilanka HettiarachchiMFMartin Fletcher

Key Points

  • To assess the prevalence and characteristics of health impairment notifications among doctors in Australia from 2012 to 2022.
  • Retrospective cohort study design
  • Analysis of linked de-identified data from Ahpra medical register and health impairment notifications
  • Focused on notifications related to physical/mental illness, cognitive decline, and substance use disorder
  • Examined the influence of doctor age, sex, specialty, and practice location on notification incidence
  • 1732 health impairment notifications recorded, affecting 1.1% of registered doctors
  • Higher incidence for male doctors (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.45) and those aged 70 or older (2.92)
  • Notifications more common in regional, rural, and remote areas compared to metropolitan areas
  • Psychiatrists had the highest incidence of notifications among specialists (2.28)
  • 21.5% of cases resulted in practice restrictions or removal

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of health impairment notifications to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and to assess the influence of doctor age, sex, specialty, practice location and country of training on the incidence of health impairment notifications. Study Design Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked de‐identified Ahpra medical register and health impairment notifications data. Setting, Participants All doctors registered to practise in Australia (except New South Wales) for whom notifications of concerns about physical or mental illness, cognitive decline, substance use disorder or other impairment to safely practising medicine were received by Ahpra during 1 July 2012–30 June 2022. Main Outcome Measures Health impairment notifications, overall and by notification type and specialty; influence of doctors' characteristics on the incidence of notifications. Results During 2012–2022, 112,677 doctors were registered to practise in Australia (other than New South Wales). A total of 1732 health impairment notifications were recorded, including at least one notification for 1258 doctors (1.1%). In multivariable analyses, the incidence of health impairment notifications was higher for male than female doctors (adjusted incidence rate ratio aIRR, 1.45; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.26–1.67), for doctors aged 70 years or older than for those aged 30–39 years (aIRR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.30–3.70) and for doctors in regional (aIRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12–1.58), rural (aIRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03–1.57) and remote areas (aIRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03–2.33) than in metropolitan areas. Among doctors with specialist qualifications, the incidence of notifications was higher for psychiatrists than internal medicine physicians (aIRR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.62–3.21) and the incidence of substance use notifications was highest for anaesthetists (vs. internal medicine physicians: aIRR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.66–4.83). Compared with doctors who trained in Australia, doctors who trained in non‐comparable jurisdictions were less likely to be subjects of health impairment notifications (aIRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43–0.64). Of 1708 notifications with final Ahpra determinations, 367 (21.5%) resulted in practice restrictions or removal from practice. Conclusions Health impairment notifications are infrequent but can have serious consequences for doctors. The incidence of health impairment notifications is influenced by doctor age, sex, specialty and location. Specific measures that take these factors into account could support workplace health and safety for doctors and protect patients from harm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bismark et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b25f3d2a12237a9349404https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70131
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Issues for clinicians training international medical graduates: a systematic review2007 · 154 citations
  2. 2Views on mandatory reporting of impaired health practitioners by their treating practitioners: a qualitative study from Australia2016 · 15 citations
  3. 3Impaired physicians1980 · 46 citations
  4. 4Substance abuse in anaesthetists2015 · 27 citations
  5. 5Mandatory reporting of impaired medical practitioners: protecting patients, supporting practitioners2014 · 22 citations