PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026eLife0 citationsOpen Access

Afadin sorts different retinal neuron types into accurate cellular layers

View Full Paper
MLMatthew R LumSPSachin PatelHGHannah K. Graham

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how afadin influences the arrangement of retinal neurons into correct cellular layers.
  • Utilized mouse genetics and viral labeling to study afadin's role in retinal development.
  • Introduced conditional afadin mutant mice within an embryonic retinal Cre model.
  • Analyzed the distribution and connectivity of various retinal neurons across cellular layers.
  • Observed scrambled distribution of bipolar cells, amacrine cells, and retinal ganglion cells in afadin mutants.
  • Mutants showed no deficits in neural fate specification or survival of these neurons.
  • Despite normal synaptic partnerships, significant decline in visual function and mis-targeting of RGC axons to the wrong areas was noted.

Abstract

Neurons use cell-adhesion molecules (CAMs) to interact with other neurons and the extracellular environment: the combination of CAMs specifies migration patterns, neuronal morphologies, and synaptic connections across diverse neuron types. Yet little is known regarding the intracellular signaling cascade mediating the CAM recognitions at the cell surface across different neuron types. Using mouse genetics and viral labeling, we investigated the neural developmental role of Afadin (Mandai et al., 1997; Takai and Nakanishi, 2003; Takahashi et al., 1999), a cytosolic adapter protein that connects multiple CAM families to intracellular F-actin. We introduced the conditional Afadin mouse mutant (Beaudoin et al., 2012) to an embryonic retinal Cre, Six3 Cre (Oliver et al., 1995; Liu and Cvekl, 2017; Diacou et al., 2018). We reported that the mouse mutants lead to the scrambled retinal neuron distribution, including bipolar cells (BCs), amacrine cells (ACs), and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), across three cellular layers of the retina. This scrambled pattern was first reported here at neuron-type resolution. Importantly, the mutants do not display deficits for BCs, ACs, or RGCs in terms of neural fate specifications or survival. Additionally, the displayed RGC types still maintain synaptic partners with putative AC types, indicating that other molecular determinants instruct synaptic choices independent of Afadin. Lastly, there is a significant decline in visual function and mis-targeting of RGC axons to incorrect zones of the superior colliculus, one of the major retinorecipient areas. Collectively, our study uncovers a unique cellular role of Afadin in sorting retinal neuron types into proper cellular layers as the structural basis for orderly visual processing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lum et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2631d2a12237a93496f7https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.105575.2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper