PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Nucleic Acids Research0 citationsOpen Access

The SMC5/SMC6 complex is critical for resolving R-loop-induced transcription–replication conflicts

View Full Paper
TWTong WuYLYouhang LiYZYuqin Zhao

Key Points

  • To investigate the role of the SMC5/6 complex in resolving transcription–replication conflicts (TRCs) caused by R-loops.
  • Examined the recruitment of the SMC5/6 complex under R-loop conditions
  • Analyzed interactions with the BTRR complex and FANCM
  • Assessed the impact on genome stability in SETX-deficient cells
  • SMC5/6 complex acts as a synthetic lethal partner of senataxin (SETX)
  • BTRR complex is recruited to TRCs by SMC5/6 and resolves these conflicts
  • FANCM accumulation at TRCs activates the FANCD2 pathway, promoting genome stability

Abstract

Abstract R-loops play essential physiological roles but also pose a significant threat to genome stability, particularly during replication, by exacerbating transcription–replication conflicts (TRCs). In this study, we have uncovered a critical role of the SMC5/6 complex in resolving TRCs to preserve fork integrity. We identified the SMC5/6 complex as a synthetic lethal partner of senataxin (SETX), an RNA/DNA helicase critical for removing R-loops that arise during replication. We demonstrated that in SETX-deficient cells, the SMC5/6 complex is recruited to TRCs in response to the buildup of DNA supercoiling and facilitates the recruitment of the BLM/TOP3A/RMI1/RMI2 complex (BTRR). Once recruited, BTRR acts to resolve the TRCs in a manner dependent on the catalytic activity of TOP3A. BTRR is also required for FANCM accumulation at TRCs, which activates the FANCD2 pathway to resolve TRCs. These studies underscore the role of SMC5/6 in sensing TRCs and define the SMC5/6–BTRR–FANCM–FANCD2 axis as an important player in mitigating TRC-induced genome instability. Our findings also provide therapeutic opportunities for targeting this axis for effective treatment of SETX-deficient tumors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b26d7d2a12237a934a11chttps://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf1537
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preventing Replication Stress to Maintain Genome Stability: Resolving Conflicts between Replication and Transcription2012 · 189 citations
  2. 2Topoisomerase III Acts at the Replication Fork To Remove Precatenanes2019 · 64 citations
  3. 3R Loops: From Physiological to Pathological Roles2019 · 745 citations
  4. 4Mechanism of SETX-BRCA1-BARD1 complex in resolution of R-loops and transcription-replication conflicts2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Branchpoint translocation by fork remodelers as a general mechanism of R-loop removal2022 · 34 citations