PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism2 citations

Ischemic core reversal on neuroimaging following endovascular reperfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
MAMohammed S AlqahtaniAAAser F AlamriAAAhmed Alkhiri

Key Points

  • To assess the prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of ischemic core reversal following endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science.
  • Included 14 studies focused on ischemic core reversal after endovascular thrombectomy.
  • Utilized a random-effects model to pool outcomes and predictors of core reversal.
  • Ischemic core reversal occurred in 17.5% of cases, with rates differing between MR and CT imaging modalities.
  • Core reversal was more likely in patients receiving IV thrombolysis and with successful recanalization during EVT.
  • Better functional outcomes were linked to ischemic core reversal, with higher odds of achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2.

Abstract

Although the ischemic core is traditionally considered irreversibly injured, emerging evidence suggests it may be reversible on follow-up imaging, particularly after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of ischemic core reversal in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science through December 2024 for studies reporting core reversal after EVT. Fourteen studies (3640 patients) with baseline and follow-up imaging were included. A random-effects model was used to pool prevalence, associated factors, and outcomes. Core reversal occurred in 17.5% (95% CI: 11.9%–25.1%), more often in MR-based (19.9%) than CT-based (15.9%) studies, and at 24–48 h (19.1%) versus 48–168 h (12.3%). Predictors included shorter onset-to-baseline imaging time (median difference 90 min), IV thrombolysis (OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.09–1.83), and successful recanalization (TICI 2B–3: OR 2.89, 95% CI: 1.65–5.06). Diabetes was associated with lower odds (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.86). Reversal correlated with better functional outcomes (mRS 0–2: OR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.55–2.86). Ischemic core reversal indicates that early imaging may overestimate infarct volume.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alqahtani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c774feb60fb80d1395855https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x251409023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper