PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Early ERPs dissociate subjectively nonconscious low- and high-level face processing

View Full Paper
TSThomas StraubeJSJosephine SkuttaSSSebastian Schindler

Key Points

  • This study examines how faces are processed when they are not consciously perceived, specifically through neural responses.
  • Used event-related potentials to assess neural responses to faces and control stimuli
  • Recorded EEG data from 40 participants
  • Analyzed early ERP components (P1 and N170) after briefly presenting stimuli
  • Participants rated their perception on a scale after each trial
  • P1 amplitudes were higher for faces and scrambles than for blanks, regardless of consciousness
  • N170 differentiated between faces and control stimuli, showing attenuated differences in nonconscious faces
  • Findings indicate two independent stages of face processing related to consciousness

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the extent to which faces are processed if they are not consciously perceived. In the present study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate neural responses to faces and two types of control stimuli (monochrome color-matched ovals and Fourier phase-scrambled faces), which allowed us to dissociate low-level and high-level face processing. Based on a pre-registered sequential Bayesian sampling protocol,we recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG) from 40 participants and compared the average amplitude of early components of the ERP (P1, N170) between faces, scrambles, and blanks presented for 17 ms, while the mask followed directly or 200 ms after the target stimulus. Participants were asked to rate their subjective perception after each trial on a perceptual awareness scale, and only trials with the lowest rating in the masked condition were considered as subjectively nonconscious. Matching the pre-registered hypotheses, P1 amplitudes were higher for faces and scrambles compared to blanks but did notdifferbetweenfacesandscrambles.This pattern was found for conscious and nonconscious faces, however, with smaller yet reliable differences in the latter case. In contrast, the N170 reliably differentiated between faces and both types of control stimuli (scrambles and blanks),again for conscious and,with attenuated differences, also for nonconscious faces. Findings support the hypothesis of two early stages of face processing, which are at least partially independent of consciousness awareness of stimuli.The P1 stage is associated with low-levelprocessing, while the N170 reflects processing of face-related configural information.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Straube et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77f1eb60fb80d1396315https://doi.org/10.17879/80958732587
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Early ERPs dissociate subjectively nonconscious low- and high-level face processing2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N1702025
  3. 3Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N1702025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Investigating electrophysiological correlates of nonconscious processing of facial expressions using dichoptic forward masking2025
  5. 5Cross-validating the electrophysiological markers of early face categorization2024