PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Horticulturae0 citationsOpen Access

Decoupling Additive and Non-Additive Genetic Effects to Optimize Breeding Strategies for Apple Phenology and Fruit Quality

View Full Paper
PAPablo AsprelliLDLuca DondiniGMGloria De Mori

Key Points

  • The research aims to differentiate between additive and non-additive genetic effects to enhance apple breeding strategies for phenology and fruit quality.
  • Conducted a genetic partial diallel design with 24 apple families from six pollen receptors and four scab-resistant genotypes.
  • Analyzed phenological traits like bud burst, flowering, and harvest dates along with fruit quality metrics.
  • Utilized ANOVA and principal component analyses to examine genotype-environment interactions and identify key genetic contributors.
  • Found significant genotype-environment interactions affecting flowering and harvest dates, influenced by temperature.
  • High heritability observed for phenological traits, while moderate heritability noted for fruit morphology and quality.
  • Identified certain apple varieties with consistent additive effects and notable heterotic performance across varying environmental conditions.

Abstract

Apple breeding programs focus on enhancing yield, quality, and disease resistance, with a strong emphasis on evaluating phenological traits like flowering time and pomological traits such as fruit size and flavour, which are crucial for commercial success and consumer preference. Twenty-four families were obtained by crossing six apple varieties selected as pollen receptors and four apple genotypes resistant to scab selected as pollen donors. Data related to bud burst date, flowering date, harvest date, lengths of the periods between bud burst and flowering and from flowering to harvest (developmental period), fruit equatorial and polar diameter, fruit polar/diameter ratio, soluble solid content (SSC) and flesh firmness were analysed as a genetic partial diallel design. The study’s ANOVA on 24 fruit families across two years revealed significant genotype–environment interactions affecting flowering date, harvest date, and developmental periods, with some variables like fruit weight and soluble solids showing consistent variation. During each year, temperature influenced phenological phases, with earlier budbreak and flowering in warmer, less variable conditions in 2019. Analysis of genetic effects indicated high heritability for phenological traits and moderate heritability for fruit morphology and quality, with parental genetic contributions varying over years. Principal component and Procrustes analyses identified key variable groupings and parent profiles, highlighting genotypes such as ‘Granny Smith’, ‘McIntosh’, and ‘HM100’ with consistent additive effects, and certain families with notable heterotic performance. Overall, genetic and environmental interactions significantly shape phenological and fruit quality traits, guiding breeding strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Asprelli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77f1eb60fb80d1396350https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12010093
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper