PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026Journal of Applied Polymer Science0 citationsOpen Access

Polyethylene–Cellulose Composites From Cellulose Xanthate Solutions

View Full Paper
CMCamila S. MoraesMFM. FloresACAntonio A. S. Curvelo

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a new method for creating cellulose-polyethylene composites with improved interfacial properties.
  • Dispersed polyethylene powder in a cellulose solution
  • Regenerated cellulose structure formed via processing
  • Hot-pressed to promote LDPE fusion and improve adhesion
  • Microscopic analysis to evaluate interfacial interactions
  • Mechanical evaluation of composite properties based on LDPE content
  • At 10% LDPE loading, polymer remained within cellulose matrix, enhancing structure.
  • Increased stiffness by twofold at 10%-30% LDPE compared to regenerated cellulose.
  • Elongation decreased by over 70% with low LDPE content.
  • At 90% LDPE, properties were similar to neat LDPE but showed lower elongation (<30%).
  • Highlighted limited compatibility but controlled interfacial structure.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study reports a processing route for fabricating cellulose/LDPE composites involving the dispersion of polyethylene powder in a cellulose solution, followed by regeneration to form a continuous cellulose structure and subsequent hot‐pressing to induce LDPE fusion and enhance interfacial adhesion. Unlike traditional routes that combine these materials by incorporating regenerated cellulose fibers into the thermoplastic matrix, this methodology emphasizes the mechanical anchoring of two continuous phases during composite formation. Microscopic analysis reveals that, at low LDPE loadings (10%, w/w), the polymer remains confined within the cellulose matrix, whereas higher LDPE concentrations (> 50%, w/w) lead to particle coalescence and the formation of a more continuous LDPE‐rich phase. Mechanical evaluation revealed a strongly composition‐dependent response. At low LDPE contents (10%–30%, w/w), stiffness increased by approximately twofold relative to regenerated cellulose, while elongation decreased by more than 70%. At 90% (w/w) LDPE, the composite showed mechanical properties closer to neat LDPE than other formulations; however, values remained moderately lower, particularly in terms of elongation, which stayed below 30% due to cellulose‐induced constraints. Despite the limited compatibility between cellulose and polyethylene, this approach offers a distinctive route to control interfacial structure and phase distribution, opening new possibilities for designing cellulose/thermoplastic composites.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moraes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a239e64f732b51ee6b8https://doi.org/10.1002/app.70394
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper