This paper presents the Operations Integrity Framework, a comprehensive socio-technical model designed to mitigate cognitive and structural failure modes in high-reliability organizations. As technical systems increase in complexity, operators frequently succumb to "Blind GPSing," the dangerous decoupling of decision-making from physical system state. Drawing on a five-year longitudinal field analysis of Severity-1 incidents across FinTech and SaaS sectors, this study identifies "Human Debt" as a primary, yet unmeasured, driver of catastrophic outages. Unlike technical debt, Human Debt represents the accumulation of cognitive offloading and hierarchical alignment failures, where "sociological Inertia" overrides technical expertise. This paper proposes a formal taxonomy of Human Debt and introduces the Socio-Technical Debt Index (STDI), a composite metric for quantifying the financial and operational friction between automated abstraction and human agency. The framework operationalizes Epistemic Vigilance, an OODA-loop-based decision protocol that prioritizes raw telemetry over hierarchical opinion or automated proxies. By institutionalizing "Structured Dissent" and mandatory "Red Team" protocols, organizations can effectively neutralize the "HiPPO effect" and Groupthink. This research provides engineering leaders with a quantifiable method to shift operational paradigms from simply managing tools to actively managing the *cognitive integrity* of the operators, ensuring system resilience in the face of increasing abstraction.
Roderick Meadows (2026) studied this question.