PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026Journal of Rare Diseases1 citationsOpen Access

Australia’s top 10 rare disease research priorities: a priority setting partnership

View Full Paper
HSHamsini SivaramakrishnanMRMadison ReillyAJAdam Jaffé

Key Points

  • The central aim is to identify and prioritize critical themes in rare disease research in Australia based on stakeholder opinions.
  • Conducted a Priority Setting Partnership project using modified James Lind Alliance methodology.
  • Administered an online elicitation survey to gather questions from stakeholders.
  • Reviewed existing literature to identify knowledge gaps.
  • Facilitated consensus workshops to refine themes and determine top priorities.
  • Identified 585 questions/comments leading to 19 overarching themes.
  • No themes were completely addressed by existing literature.
  • Top three priorities include treatment development, health professional education, and improved diagnosis.

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to identify and prioritise the ten most important unanswered themes in rare disease research in Australia by integrating perspectives of key stakeholders, including people living with rare disease, parents/carers, health professionals, and rare disease community advocates. Methods We conducted a Priority Setting Partnership project based on a modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership methodology. The process involved an online elicitation survey, review of existing literature, and consensus workshops with Australian rare disease stakeholders. Results In the elicitation survey ( n = 185), 585 questions/comments were coded, and 19 overarching themes identified. No themes were completely addressed by existing literature. In the consensus workshops ( n = 34), the 19 themes were refined, and the Top 10 priorities determined. The top three priorities were (1) development of, and access to, the best treatments and cures, (2) awareness and education for health professionals and service providers, and (3) diagnosis, including screening. Conclusion The Top 10 priorities span a wide range of health research domains, including access to effective diagnosis and treatment, healthcare system capacity and expertise, and support for patients, families, and carers. Patient or public contribution A Project Advisory Group and Steering Committee were established to guide this study. The Project Advisory Group met four times across the duration of the project, while the Steering Committee met three times to provide feedback and support recruitment and translation of findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sivaramakrishnan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a849e64f732b51eec3ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44162-026-00146-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper