PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 20260 citations

Long-Term Efficacy of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis: A 6-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Cohort.

View Full Paper
MIMir Shahid ul IslamShri Venkateshwara UniversityAHAltaf HussainShri Venkateshwara UniversityNHNajmul Huda

Key Points

  • Evaluate the long-term efficacy and predictors of deterioration in knee osteoarthritis treated with PRP.
  • Conducted a prospective cohort study with 78 patients and 118 knees
  • Administered 3 monthly PRP injections
  • Followed patients at 4 and 6 years for outcomes
  • Assessed pain and function using VAS and WOMAC
  • Analyzed data with linear mixed-effects modeling and survival analysis
  • Significant improvements in VAS and WOMAC scores at 4 years
  • Outcomes regressed toward baseline by 6 years
  • KL grade was a strong predictor of deterioration
  • Patients with KL III had a higher risk of treatment failure than those with KL I
  • Body mass index also modestly influenced outcomes

Abstract

This prospective study evaluated the long-term efficacy, radiographic progression, and predictors of deterioration in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treated with intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. Seventy-eight patients (118 knees) with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-III KOA received 3 monthly PRP injections and were followed at 4 and 6 years. Pain and function were assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Radiographic progression, analgesic use, and predictors of clinical worsening were analysed using linear mixed-effects modeling and survival analysis. At 4 years, significant improvements were observed in VAS (6.72 ± 1.82 to 4.47 ± 1.32, p < 0.0001) and WOMAC (58.32 ± 17.58 to 39.67 ± 10.37, p < 0.0001). By 6 years, outcomes regressed toward baseline (VAS 6.31 ± 1.47, p = 0.079; WOMAC 56.45 ± 14.35, p = 0.41). Benefits were more sustained in KL I-II compared with KL III, who showed earlier decline and greater analgesic use. KL progression was the strongest predictor of worsening (β = +14.2 WOMAC points, p < 0.001), with each baseline KL grade increase adding +6.5 WOMAC points (p = 0.002); BMI also contributed modestly (p = 0.018). Survival analysis showed KL III had a 3.1-fold higher failure risk than KL I (median 3.5 vs. 5.1 years, p < 0.001). PRP provides meaningful symptom relief and functional improvement for up to 4 years in mild-to-moderate KOA, but benefits decline by 6 years, particularly in advanced disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Islam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1ac19e64f732b51ef06ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70139
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper