PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Gauge Symmetry from Coherent Comparison

View Full Paper
FBFlip Boer

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore why internal symmetries exist and how they arise from coherent comparison in physical systems.
  • Assumed a system must compare outcomes against a reference for persistence.
  • Derived continuous symmetries from analyzing internal orientation effects under coherent comparison.
  • Introduced a framework relating to gauge fields and their connections without empirical assumptions.
  • Identified three independent symmetries: $U(1)$, $SU(2)$, and $SU(3)$.
  • Showed that local symmetry arises when comparisons involve independent acts.
  • Demonstrated that structures correspond to those in the Standard Model, derived as a consequence of coherent comparison.

Abstract

Gauge symmetry is usually introduced as a postulate: physical laws are assumed to be invariant under certain internal transformations. While empirically successful, this leaves open a foundational question: why should such internal symmetries exist at all, and why do they take the specific form observed in nature? In this work we derive gauge symmetry from a minimal, non-physical requirement. We assume only that a system capable of persistence must be able to compare the outcome of a transformation against a reference. Coherent comparison necessarily produces a quantitative deviation, represented in an internal complex vector space. Comparison fixes magnitudes and relations but leaves internal orientation undetermined, introducing an unavoidable redundancy of description. By analyzing the distinct ways in which internal orientation remains unfixed, we show that coherent comparison forces exactly three independent and non-redundant continuous symmetries: a global phase freedom yielding U (1), an unbiased mixing of identity-like and difference-like components yielding SU (2), and a basis redundancy of a triadic deviation arena under collective neutrality yielding SU (3). These symmetries arise sequentially and exhaust the continuous internal freedom compatible with coherent comparison. When comparison is required between logically independent acts, internal symmetry becomes local. Preserving coherent comparison under local reorientation necessitates a connection that translates internal frames, and its curvature measures the obstruction to consistent global alignment. In physical interpretations, these structures correspond to gauge fields and field strength. No spacetime, dynamics, particles, or empirical input are assumed. The resulting gauge group and connection structure coincide with those of the Standard Model, not by hypothesis, but as a structural consequence of coherent comparison.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Flip Boer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1b189e64f732b51ef1aahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18279472
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Gauge Symmetry as Closure Transport Reconstructing U(1), SU(2), and SU(3) as Infratier Coherence Regimes2026
  2. 2Reconstructing Gauge Symmetry as Closure Transport U(1), SU(2), and SU(3) as Infratier Coherence Regimes2026
  3. 3Why Gauge Symmetry Cannot Be Ontic2026
  4. 4Gauge Emergence and three linked structures: Bivectorial phase, Toroidal closure and Closure-depth differentiation.2026
  5. 5Gauge Emergence and three linked structures: Bivectorial phase, Toroidal closure and Closure-depth differentiation.2026