PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026Cancer Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Advantage of Scheduled Upfront Lenvatinib Administration Followed by Transarterial Chemoembolization Therapy Over Lenvatinib Monotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Intermediate‐Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

View Full Paper
NTNobuhito TanikiKOKeisuke OjiroRKRyosuke Kasuga

Key Points

  • The study evaluates the efficacy of scheduled lenvatinib administration combined with TACE in patients with unresectable intermediate-stage HCC.
  • Retrospective multicenter study design conducted from 2018 to 2024.
  • Enrolled 41 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate-stage HCC unsuitable for TACE.
  • Patients were divided into a LEN-TACE group (25 patients) and a lenvatinib monotherapy group (16 patients).
  • Evaluated treatment outcomes using radiological assessments and overall survival metrics.
  • LEN-TACE group had higher complete response and objective response rates compared to the lenvatinib monotherapy group.
  • Median overall survival in the LEN-TACE group was not reached, while it was 16.2 months in the monotherapy group.
  • The LEN-TACE group demonstrated significantly superior overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.99 (95% CI: 1.01–8.95; p = 0.0496).
  • Superiority in progression-free survival and overall survival was also noted in a propensity score-matched cohort.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Combining systemic chemotherapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has demonstrated improved outcomes, with promising results for the efficacy of lenvatinib pretreatment combined with TACE in single‐arm studies involving patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a scheduled upfront lenvatinib combined with a TACE regimen in patients with HCC, representing both the first study to comparatively analyze this approach and to focus specifically on patients unsuitable for TACE. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study between 2018 and 2024, enrolling 41 patients with unresectable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate‐stage HCC who were considered unsuitable for TACE owing to factors such as exceeding the up‐to‐7 criteria, having infiltrative HCC, or multiple asynchronous recurrent HCC. Of these patients, 25 received upfront lenvatinib administration prior to TACE (LEN‐TACE group), followed by continuous lenvatinib and on‐demand TACE, and 16 received lenvatinib monotherapy. Results Radiological evaluation revealed significantly higher complete response (CR) and objective response rates (ORR) in the LEN‐TACE group than in the lenvatinib group. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the LEN‐TACE group, whereas it was 16.2 months in the lenvatinib monotherapy group, indicating a significantly superior OS in the LEN‐TACE group (hazard ratio HR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.01–8.95; p = 0.0496). Superiority in both PFS and OS was also observed in the propensity score‐matched (PSM) cohort for the LEN‐TACE group. Conclusion Scheduled upfront lenvatinib combined with TACE is superior to lenvatinib monotherapy for intermediate‐stage HCC, particularly in patients unsuitable for TACE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taniki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1b189e64f732b51ef1fbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71503
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper