PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Hydrology0 citationsOpen Access

Laboratory-Scale Evaluation of an Electrochemical Barrier System for Targeted Removal of Vinyl Chloride and Trichloroethylene from Groundwater

View Full Paper
NDNataša DudukovićLPLea PlavšinKTKristiana Zrnić Tenodi

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an electrochemical barrier for removing vinyl chloride and trichloroethylene from groundwater.
  • Conducted experiments in a covered batch reactor using synthetic groundwater.
  • Varying parameters included current intensity, treatment time, anode surface area, and inter-electrode distance.
  • Analyzed electrochemical performance using multivariate analysis (PCA) and correlation assessment.
  • Achieved 97% removal of vinyl chloride and 95% removal of trichloroethylene at 60 mA in 20 minutes.
  • Extended treatment to 60 minutes increased removal rates to approximately 99% for vinyl chloride and 98.5% for trichloroethylene.
  • Identified applied current as the dominant control parameter affecting TCE removal.

Abstract

Chlorinated solvents such as vinyl chloride (VC) and trichloroethylene (TCE) represent a persistent threat to groundwater-derived drinking-water supplies, including riverbank filtration well fields in alluvial aquifers. This work presents a laboratory-scale evaluation of an electrochemical barrier concept for targeted VC and TCE removal performed using synthetic groundwater representative of a riverbank filtration setting in the Danube River basin. Experiments were conducted in a covered batch reactor equipped with Ti/IrO2–RuO2 mixed-metal-oxide anodes and Ti cathodes, systematically varying current intensity (10–60 mA), treatment time (0–60 min), active anode surface area (12–48 cm2), and inter-electrode distance (0.5–2.5 cm). At 60 mA, VC and TCE removals of 97% and 95%, respectively, were achieved within 20 min, while prolonged treatment to 60 min increased removal to about 99% for VC and 98.5% for TCE. Multivariate analysis (PCA) and correlation assessment identified applied current as the dominant control parameter, particularly for TCE removal, whereas electrode configuration and spacing played secondary roles within the investigated range. For the most cost-effective treatments meeting Serbian drinking-water criteria, estimated electricity costs were 0.39 €/m3 for VC and 0.10 €/m3 for TCE. Overall, the results demonstrate the technical feasibility and promising cost-effectiveness of electrochemical barriers as a proactive measure to protect riverbank filtration systems from future VC and TCE contamination n urban environments, while highlighting the need for follow-up studies on by-product formation and long-term performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duduković et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd26642b1836717e1cf1https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology13010040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bioelectrochemical single reactor for reductive and oxidative removal of trichloroethylene from contaminated groundwater2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Effective electrochemical trichloroethylene removal from water enabled by selective molecular catalysis2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Waterjet Injection Technology to Enhance Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Contamination2026
  4. 4Groundwater Bioremediation through Reductive Dechlorination in a Permeable Bioelectrochemical Reactor2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Remediation of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons in groundwater using ZVI and low-voltage DC field: Long-term performance and insights from pilot-scale experimental study2025