PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Genes0 citationsOpen Access

Identification and Analysis of the Terpene Synthases (TPS) Gene Family in Camellia Based on Pan-Genome

View Full Paper
RYRenjie YinHLHaibin LiuSLShanyuanrui Lin

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the terpene synthase gene family across various Camellia genomes to understand genetic variation and expression.
  • Conducted pan-genome analysis of TPS genes in nine Camellia genomes.
  • Integrated pan-transcriptome profiling across eight different tissues.
  • Carried out phylogenetic analysis, gene-structure, and physicochemical analyses.
  • Identified 381 TPS genes, with wild species showing higher gene counts than cultivated ones.
  • Classified TPS genes into five subfamilies, with TPS-b and TPS-a being the most abundant.
  • Observed significant copy-number variation and intense purifying selection across subfamilies.

Abstract

Terpenes are major determinants of tea aroma, and terpene synthases (TPSs) catalyze key steps in terpenoid biosynthesis. To capture gene-family variation beyond a single reference, we performed a pan-genome–based analysis of TPS genes across nine Camellia genomes (three wild tea relatives and six cultivated Camellia sinensis accessions) and integrated pan-transcriptome profiling across eight tissues. We identified 381 TPS genes; wild species contained more TPSs than cultivated accessions (mean 58.3 vs. 34.3), suggesting a putative contraction. Phylogenetic analysis with Arabidopsis TPSs classified Camellia TPSs into five subfamilies, dominated by TPS-b (149) and TPS-a (140), whereas TPS-c was rare (8). Gene-structure and physicochemical analyses revealed marked subfamily divergence, with TPS-c showing highly conserved coding-region length. Orthology clustering assigned 355 TPSs to 19 orthogroups, including five core groups (190 genes, 53.5%) and 14 dispensable groups (165 genes, 46.5%); core/non-core status was significantly associated with subfamily composition. Tandem and proximal duplication contributed most to TPS expansion (29.4% and 29.1%), and all orthogroups exhibited copy-number variation, with pronounced lineage-specific expansions. Ka/Ks analyses indicated pervasive purifying selection (median 0.516) but heterogeneous constraints among subfamilies. Finally, cultivated tea showed higher TPS expression in most tissues, especially mature leaf and stem, and TPS-g displayed the broadest and strongest expression. Together, these results provide a pan-genome resource for Camellia TPSs and highlight how domestication, duplication, and CNV shape terpene-related genetic diversity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd26642b1836717e1d93https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17010094
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evolutionary Dynamics and Functional Diversification of bZIP Transcription Factors in Cucurbitaceae: A Pan-Genome Approach2025 · 6 citations
  2. 2Plant terpenoid synthases: Molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis1998 · 1,126 citations
  3. 3Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato2020 · 919 citations
  4. 4HMM-ModE: implementation, benchmarking and validation with HMMER32014 · 16 citations
  5. 5Probing the Role of the DXDD Motif in Class II Diterpene Cyclases2007 · 102 citations