PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Exploring Inclusion in Austria’s Breast Cancer Screening:A Dual-Perspective Study of Women with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Caregivers

View Full Paper
TWTheresa WagnerNMNourhan MakledKSKatrina Scior

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening for women with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in Austria.
  • Conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews with women with mild-to-moderate IDs and caregivers.
  • Utilized thematic analysis within a constructivist framework.
  • Involved 17 women aged 45 and older and 10 caregivers to gather dual perspectives.
  • Identified barriers like social taboos, psychological distress, and exclusion from standardized procedures.
  • Facilitators included accessible information and person-centered communication.
  • Confirmed that systemic and organizational barriers limit screening participation for women with IDs.

Abstract

Women with intellectual disabilities (IDs) face persistent health inequities, particularly in preventive services such as breast cancer screening, where participation rates remain disproportionately low. These disparities contribute to higher mortality and poorer survivorship outcomes, often linked to later-stage diagnoses. To better understand these challenges and inform the development of inclusive screening programs, this qualitative study conducted in Austria explored barriers, facilitators, and needs related to breast cancer screening from the dual perspectives of 17 women with mild-to-moderate IDs aged 45 and older and 10 caregivers. Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were analyzed thematically within a constructivist framework, integrating perspectives from both groups. Barriers included social taboos around sexuality, psychological distress, exclusion through standardized procedures, and unclear responsibility among stakeholders. Facilitators involved person-centered communication, accessible information, emotional and practical support, and familiar healthcare environments. Women with IDs expressed a strong desire for education, autonomy, and inclusion, while caregivers played a pivotal role in enabling access. These findings demonstrate that low screening participation among women with IDs is driven by systemic and organizational barriers rather than lack of health awareness or willingness to participate. Without structurally inclusive design, organized screening programs risk perpetuating preventable inequities in early detection. Embedding accessibility, clear accountability, and person-centered communication as standard features of breast cancer screening is therefore a public health priority to reduce avoidable late-stage diagnoses and narrow survival disparities for women with IDs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wagner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd26642b1836717e1e25https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23010124
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper