PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026JACOW0 citationsOpen Access

Perfomance evaluation of tailored shielding for energy-selective neutron detection in reactor environments

View Full Paper
AJAndrew JonesADAnna DetkinaBMBruno Merk

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how different shielding materials and geometries affect neutron detection efficiency in reactor environments.
  • Simulations using MCNP-6.3 to analyze reactor materials and shield designs.
  • Benchmark detectors tested against a 1 Ci Am/Be neutron source.
  • Comparison between conical shield designs and no shielding.
  • Conical shielding showed lower efficiency for thermal neutron detection.
  • Higher efficiency was observed for fast neutron detection with conical shielding compared to no additional material.

Abstract

With nuclear reactor technology rapidly advancing and the plan to raise the nuclear energy production by a factor of 4, the need for advanced detectors, geometries and shields has become apparent. The precise and reliable measurement of the neutron flux is not only relevant for the safe operation of nuclear reactors, but also for future reactor experiments essential for progressing the technology. In the presented work, simulations were performed using MCNP-6.3 to investigate the effects of various common reactor materials in different shield geometries on the performance of benchmark detectors. This was performed using a validated simulation of a 1 Ci Am/Be neutron source located at the University of Liverpool for a detailed experiment to simulation evaluation. The use of a conical shield/reflector material around the detector showed lower efficiency for the detection of thermal neutrons, and higher efficiency for the detection of fast neutrons when compared to the results for no additional material. The tailored measurement of neutrons of specific energies is highly relevant for reactor experiments on innovative technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jones et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd90642b1836717e230chttps://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-ibic2025-mopmo26
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Monte Carlo simulation and optimization of neutron ray shielding performance of related materials2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Performance of NB-CTMFD Detector Versus Ludlum 42-49B, and Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Hard (Am-Be) and Soft (Cf-252 Fission) Energy Spectra Neutron Sources Within Lead/Concrete Shielded Configurations2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Neutronic Analysis of Non-Self-Shielded Cyclotron: An Integrated Approach Using Experimental Measurements and Monte Carlo Simulations for In-Depth Assessment2026
  4. 4Advances in High-Temperature Irradiation-Resistant Neutron Detectors2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Simulation and experimental validation of spent nuclear fuel cask shields2026