PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026JACOW0 citationsOpen Access

First measurements of a prototype stripline BPM for PETRA IV comparison with simulation

View Full Paper
PSP. N. SwallowGKGero KubeMLMartin Lantschner

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate a prototype stripline Beam Position Monitor for PETRA IV and compare it with simulations.
  • Installed the BPM prototype at the PETRA III testbed for evaluation
  • Conducted thermal measurements and signal analysis
  • Compared measured data against simulations from CST Studio Suite
  • Analyzed effects of mechanical details on power loss and heating
  • Observed unexpected signal oscillations and significant heating up to 135 °C
  • Initial models predicted only 5 W power loss, but real measurements showed increases up to 96 W due to cavity-induced resonances
  • Updated simulations aligned well with measured signals and thermal data
  • Switching to an RF-sealing gasket reduced temperature to 65 °C

Abstract

We present signal and thermal measurements from the first prototype of a stripline Beam Position Monitor (BPM) intended for the PETRA IV synchrotron ring 1. The monitor was installed at the PETRA III testbed for evaluation and compared against CST Studio Suite 2 simulation results. Initial measurements revealed unexpected signal oscillations and significant heating (up to 135 °C), which were not reproduced in ideal models. For a smooth beam pipe, the expected power loss based on the wake-loss factor would only be 5 W. Including mechanical details such as flanges and copper gaskets in the simulation revealed cavity-induced resonances, which increased the power loss up to 96 W. The updated model showed good agreement with the measured signals in both time (TD) and frequency domains (FD) as well as with thermal data. Replacing the gasket with a RF-sealing variant lowered the measured temperature to 65 °C. This study highlights that multiple mechanical and electromagnetic factors must be understood and included in simulations to predict beam-induced effects in high-frequency diagnostics accurately.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Swallow et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd90642b1836717e2340https://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-ibic2025-wepco26
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper