PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering2 citations

Mass transfer resistances in mesoporous silica‐alginate/chitosan encapsulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioethanol production

View Full Paper
ABAbdulmumin BilyaminHAH.I. AttaAAA.Y. Atta

Key Points

  • The central aim is to explore the effects of mesoporosity and particle size on mass transfer resistance in yeast encapsulation for bioethanol production.
  • Designed mesoporous membranes with varying glucose amounts as pore-forming agents.
  • Examined the encapsulated capsules named G-0.75, G-1.5, and G-3.
  • Conducted simulations to analyze substrate concentration and mass transfer resistance.
  • Assessed effects of particle size reduction on substrate delivery to the center of the capsules.
  • In G-0 capsules, substrate depletion occurred at a radius of 0.6, indicating high mass transfer resistance.
  • More than 40% of the substrate reached the center in mesoporous G-3 capsules.
  • With reduced particle size, around 10% of substrate reached the center in G-0, while approximately 80% did in G-3.
  • Using an effectiveness factor, substrate concentration improved in all capsule types.

Abstract

Abstract Microbial cell encapsulation for bioethanol production offers several benefits, including protection of cells from harsh fermentation conditions and simplification of their recovery and reuse. However, a significant challenge in microbial encapsulation is mass transfer resistance. In this study, a mesoporous membrane was designed and examined for the first time to address substrate mass transfer issues. The capsules were named G‐0.75, G‐1.5, and G‐3, corresponding to the amounts of glucose (0.75, 1.5, and 3 g) used as a pore‐forming agent. Simulation results showed that in the conventional G‐0 capsules, substrate concentration (fermentable sugar) was depleted at a radius of 0.6, indicating significant resistance to mass transfer. In the mesoporous G‐3 capsules, over 40% of the substrate reached the centre, suggesting reduced mass transfer resistance compared to G‐0. When an effectiveness factor accounting for mass transfer resistance was included, the substrate concentration improved in each capsule, with glucose reaching a radius of 0.2 in G‐0 and more than 50% of the substrate reaching the centre in G‐3. Additionally, halving the particle size allowed 10% of the substrate to reach the centre in G‐0, while approximately 80% did so in G‐3. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, how both glucose‐induced mesoporosity and particle size reduction influence mass transfer resistance in bioethanol production, alongside the kinetics and diffusion data essential for process design, modelling, simulation, and optimization. This represents a significant advancement for heterogeneous bioprocesses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bilyamin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdad642b1836717e24a4https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.70244
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper