PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1 citationsOpen Access

Revisiting the Galactic Winds in M82 I: the recent starburst and launch of outflow in simulations

View Full Paper
TWTian-Rui WangSun Yat-sen UniversityWZWeishan ZhuSun Yat-sen UniversityXLXue-Fu LiSun Yat-sen University

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the launch of galactic outflows in M82, focusing on the role of star formation and feedback mechanisms.
  • Conducted hydrodynamic simulations with a sink-particle module for star formation.
  • Explored effects of stellar feedback mechanisms and gas return from star-forming clouds.
  • Analyzed outflow dynamics through distinct phases over a starburst lasting ~25 Myr.
  • Simulations indicated a peak star formation rate of 20-50 solar masses per year.
  • The outflow forms in two stages, initially driven by supernovae that create a superbubble.
  • Cool filaments survive feedback impacts, extending the outflow to hundreds of parsecs.

Abstract

Abstract We revisit the launch of the galactic outflow in M82 using hydrodynamic simulations. Employing a sink-particle module, we self-consistently resolve star formation and feedback, avoiding reliance on simplified models. We investigate the effects of stellar feedback mechanisms, gas return from star-forming clouds, and disk mass on the starburst and outflow. Our simulations generate a starburst lasting ~25 Myr, peaking at 20–50 { M, yr^-1}, although the total stellar mass often exceeds M82’s estimated value. The outflow develops in two stages: initially, continuous SNe form small bubbles that merge into a superbubble containing warm/hot gas and intermediate- to high-density cool filaments. After ~10 Myr, the superbubble breaks out of the disk, and within ~15 Myr a kpc-scale outflow forms. Cool filaments survive stellar feedback, become entrained in the wind, and stretch to hundreds of parsecs. Transport from the cool ISM is the dominant net contributor to the total mass of the cool phase in the outflow, whereas transfers from hotter phases, such as through condensation or precipitation, provide only a minor net contribution, likely offset by simultaneous transfer from the cool phase back to hotter phases. While the mass loading factor is comparable to M82, the cool gas outflow rate and velocity are lower, with velocities ~60 % below observed values; warm and hot gas are ~25 % slower. SN feedback is the primary driver, and gas return significantly influences the starburst and outflow, while other factors are secondary. Stronger clustered SN feedback is likely required to better match observations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdad642b1836717e24f5https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Kolmogorov‐Burgers Model for Star‐forming Turbulence2002 · 145 citations
  2. 2Near-Infrared Wide-Field Surface Photometry of M821995 · 24 citations
  3. 3OPTAB: Public code for generating gas opacity tables for radiation hydrodynamics simulations2021 · 10 citations
  4. 4Metallicity-dependent wind parameter predictions for OB stars2021 · 98 citations
  5. 5Characterizing mass, momentum, energy, and metal outflow rates of multiphase galactic winds in the FIRE-2 cosmological simulations2021 · 151 citations