PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Buildings0 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced Prediction of Rocking and Sliding of Rigid Blocks Using a Modified Semi-Analytical Approach and Optimized Finite Element Modeling

View Full Paper
IIIdowu Oluwabunmi Itiola

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve the prediction of how rigid blocks rock and slide during earthquakes by using enhanced modeling techniques.
  • Developed a modified semi-analytical framework to capture the coupling of rocking and sliding motions.
  • Utilized an optimized Finite Element Method to investigate the dynamics of rectangular blocks with initial angular displacements.
  • Compared findings with classical models to identify discrepancies in motion mode transitions.
  • The proposed framework accurately identifies various response modes including rest, rocking, sliding, and free-flight.
  • Notable differences were observed in intermediate regimes compared to classical models, particularly in motion sensitivity to friction and shape.
  • FEM simulations illustrated that deformable models more accurately represent energy dissipation during impacts than rigid-body models.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the rocking and sliding response of free-standing rigid blocks under seismic excitation remains challenging, particularly in regimes where rocking and sliding are strongly coupled and motion mode transitions occur. This study presents a modified semi-analytical framework and an optimized Finite Element Method (FEM) approach to investigate the nonlinear dynamics of rigid rectangular blocks subjected to initial angular displacements, assuming Coulomb friction and near-inelastic impacts. The proposed semi-analytical formulation explicitly captures the coupling between rocking and sliding motions, enabling systematic identification of rest, rocking, sliding, rocking–sliding, and free-flight response modes. Benchmark comparisons with Veeraraghavan’s classical model show overall agreement in limiting cases but reveal notable differences in intermediate regimes, where motion mode transitions are highly sensitive to friction coefficient and slenderness ratio. These discrepancies arise from the ability of the present formulation to resolve transitional rocking–sliding behavior that is not fully represented in uncoupled or limiting-case assumptions. Complementary FEM simulations employing both rigid and deformable body representations further elucidate the role of contact modeling and energy dissipation. While rigid-body FEM models offer computational efficiency, they exhibit localized penetration and residual bouncing due to contact enforcement limitations. In contrast, deformable FEM models more closely approximate near-inelastic collision behavior and dissipate impact energy more effectively, albeit at higher computational cost. The combined semi-analytical and FEM results provide a robust framework for interpreting motion mode transitions, quantifying contact and penetration effects, and defining the applicability limits of simplified rigid-body models. These findings offer practical guidance for selecting appropriate modeling strategies for seismic response assessment of free-standing rigid blocks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Idowu Oluwabunmi Itiola (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdad642b1836717e2673https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020429
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper