PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Nanomaterials0 citationsOpen Access

Geometry-Dependent Photonic Nanojet Formation and Arrays Coupling

View Full Paper
ZSZehua SunSGshaobo GeLSLujun Shen

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze how different geometric configurations of dielectric microstructures impact photonic nanojet formation and coupling.
  • Investigated four geometric configurations: cylinders, cones, truncated pyramids, pyramids
  • Utilized full-wave finite-difference time-domain simulations to analyze optical fields
  • Evaluated inter-element coupling and scattering under varying array arrangements and conditions.
  • Cylindrical and truncated pyramid geometries showed higher scattering and multistage focusing
  • Pyramid and cone structures achieved higher PNJ intensities: 47.5 a.u. and 93 a.u., respectively
  • Lateral focusing is primarily influenced by geometric configuration, not array arrangement.

Abstract

This work systematically investigates photonic nanojet (PNJ) planar arrays formed by periodic arrangements of dielectric microstructures with four geometric configurations: cylinders, cones, truncated pyramids, and pyramids, focusing on the effects of geometry, array arrangement, and array sparsity on PNJ formation and coupling behavior. Full-wave finite-difference time-domain simulations were performed to analyze optical field distributions under different array conditions. The results indicate that under approximately infinite array conditions, different geometries exhibit markedly different coupling responses. Cylindrical and truncated pyramid structures are more susceptible to inter-element scattering, leading to pronounced multistage focusing, whereas pyramid and cone structures maintain higher spatial stability due to dominant localized tip-focusing mechanisms. For the central elements, the maximum PNJ intensity is about 16.4 a.u. for cylindrical structures and 33.5 a.u. for truncated pyramid structures, while significantly higher intensities of approximately 47.5 a.u. and 93 a.u. are achieved for pyramid and cone structures, respectively. In contrast, the FWHM remains nearly constant for all geometries under different array conditions, indicating that lateral focusing is primarily governed by geometry rather than array arrangement. By tuning the array spacing, the inter-element coupling strength can be continuously weakened, and different geometries require distinct sparsity levels to reach the weak-coupling limit. These results establish the dominant role of geometric configuration in PNJ planar arrays and provide guidance for their predictable design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be8d642b1836717e3274https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16020136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper