ABSTRACT Background Gadopiclenol is a high‐relaxivity contrast agent enabling dose reduction while maintaining image quality. However, comparison with conventional agents remains limited in body MRI. Purpose To intra‐individually compare half‐dose gadopiclenol and standard‐dose gadobenate for image quality and lesion conspicuity in abdominal MRI. Study Type Retrospective. Population One hundred patients (55 men; mean age: 64 ± 14 years) who underwent both abdominal MRI with gadobenate (0.1 mmol/kg) and gadopiclenol (0.05 mmol/kg) on the same scanner within 12 months. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T / 3T , dynamic T1 ‐weighted imaging pre‐contrast, early arterial ( EAP ), late arterial ( LAP ), portal venous ( PVP ), and equilibrium phases ( EP ) using 3D fat‐suppressed gradient echo sequence. Assessment Signal intensity of liver, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, aorta, portal vein, and abdominal lesions was measured on each phase except EAP. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and magnitude of contrast enhancement (ΔE) were calculated for organs. In lesions, lesion‐to‐background ratio (LBR) and ΔE were calculated. Subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity were assessed by three readers using a 5‐point Likert scale. Statistical Tests Paired t ‐test and Wilcoxon test. p < 0.05 indicated statistically significant results. Results Gadopiclenol yielded significantly higher CNR and SNR for pancreas, portal vein, and kidney in LAP. No significant differences in CNR ( p: 0.372–0.858) and SNR ( p : 0.433–0.936) were found in PVP. In EP, gadobenate showed higher hepatic CNR, while CNR and SNR of all other organs were comparable ( p : 0.103–0.912). Gadopiclenol showed higher pancreatic ΔE in all enhanced phases. LBR and ΔE of 21 evaluated lesions were comparable across all phases ( p : 0.100–0.821). No significant differences were observed in readers' perception of lesion enhancement ( p : 0.059–0.957). Conclusion Half‐dose gadopiclenol provides comparable subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity to standard‐dose gadobenate, with superior pancreatic, kidney, and portal vein enhancement in LAP, and similar performance in PVP and EP. Level of Evidence 4.
Gaudio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: