PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics0 citationsOpen Access

Digital maternity care in Germany: a cross-sectional web-based survey on midwives’ perceptions

View Full Paper
SGSebastian GriewingPTP TeskeJWJohannes Wichmann

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess midwives' perceptions of their work environment and the use of digital tools in maternity care in Germany.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey
  • Targeted midwives regarding their work situation and digital tool usage
  • Evaluated perceptions of strain in maternity care and digital competencies
  • 92.2% of midwives feel increased strain in maternity care
  • 87.6% actively use various digital tools, albeit unauthorized
  • Self-reported digital competence averages 7.09 on a 10-point scale
  • Interest in using electronic patient records is high (72.1%), but lower for AI (38.8%)

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Maternity care is a central component of any healthcare system and is largely provided by midwives. Considering increasing cost pressures and growing demand for efficiency within the German healthcare system, the development of efficient, digitally supported care models are both encouraged and actively promoted, especially in pregnancy. However, to date, no such model has been sustainably established in the field of maternity care. In particular, the perspectives of midwives have largely been neglected. Methods As part of an initial needs assessment for the Participatory Design of a digitally supported maternity care model, this study uses a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire to explore midwives’ perceptions of their current work situation, use of digital tools and digital pregnancy care. Results 92.2% of participants (n = 129) perceive increasing strain on maternity care in Germany (5-point Likert; M = 4.49, SD = ± 0.69). 87.6% use a variety of digital tools in their professional environment, yet unvalidated and unauthorized solutions. Self-perceived digital competence is high (10-point NRS; 7.09 ± 1.48). The intention to use the technology decreases in parallel with the level of awareness, being highest for the electronic patient record (5-point Likert; 72.1%; 3.84 ± 0.97) and lowest for artificial intelligence (38.8%; 3.17 ± 1.05). Conclusion The study highlights midwives’ openness to digital solutions, their active, though informal, use of such tools, and emphasizes the need to integrate their perspectives into the development of certified, sustainable digital care models in maternity care within an increasingly strained healthcare system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Griewing et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bea8642b1836717e3478https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08239-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View12003 · 44,315 citations
  2. 2Impact of Remote Telemedical Management on Mortality and Hospitalizations in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure2011 · 732 citations
  3. 3Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)2004 · 6,645 citations
  4. 4Awareness and intention-to-use of digital health applications, artificial intelligence and blockchain technology in breast cancer care2024 · 17 citations
  5. 5Acceptance of AI in Health Care for Short- and Long-Term Treatments: Pilot Development Study of an Integrated Theoretical Model2024 · 4 citations