PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Journal of Public Health Dentistry0 citations

The Association Between Intensive Parenting Attitudes and Topical Fluoride Opposition

View Full Paper
AKAlice KoACAdam C. CarleTTThomas Tanbonliong

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the relationship between caregivers' intensive parenting attitudes and their opposition to topical fluoride for children.
  • Secondary analysis of survey data on caregivers' beliefs about fluoride.
  • Administered an 85-item survey between November 2020 and September 2021.
  • Sample included 1,135 English-speaking caregivers of children under 18 years.
  • Used linear regression to assess the association between intensive parenting attitudes and fluoride opposition, adjusting for confounders.
  • Average caregiver age was 41.7 years, with most being women (73%), White (55.5%), and non-Hispanic (79.3%).
  • Mean topical fluoride opposition score was 2.0, while the mean intensive parenting attitudes score was 1.7.
  • A 1-point increase in intensive parenting attitudes was linked to a 0.3-point rise in fluoride opposition (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; p < 0.001).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study's goal was to investigate the association between intensive parenting attitudes and topical fluoride opposition. Methods This was a secondary analysis of data on caregivers' beliefs about fluoride for their children. An 85‐item survey was administered from November 2020 to September 2021 ( N = 1135). Participants were eligible if they were an English‐speaking caregiver of a child under 18 years. The outcome variable was topical fluoride opposition, defined as how opposed the caregiver was to topical fluoride for their child (self‐reported scale of 0–10). The explanatory variable was intensive parenting attitudes, defined as the extent of child‐centered, time‐intensive, and self‐sacrificing parenting, measured through a composite score from three survey items. Linear regression was used to test the study hypothesis, adjusting for confounders. All analyses were performed in SPSS. Results The mean ± SD caregiver age was 41.7 ± 8.8 years, with most caregivers being women (73.0%), White (55.5%), non‐Hispanic (79.3%), having greater than a 4‐year degree (28.5%), and having private dental insurance (45.1%). The mean ± SD topical fluoride opposition score was 2.0 ± 3.1, and the mean ± SD intensive parenting attitudes score was 1.7 ± 0.4. After adjusting for confounders, a 1‐point increase in intensive parenting attitudes score was associated with a 0.3‐point increase in topical fluoride opposition score (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; p < 0.001). Conclusions Intensive parenting attitudes were significantly and positively associated with topical fluoride opposition. Clinicians can utilize these findings to assess caregivers' intensive parenting attitudes, learn about concerns, and address them by tailoring communication strategies to discuss appropriate risk‐based recommendations about topical fluoride.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ko et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bea8642b1836717e3561https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.70033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper