PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Agronomy0 citationsOpen Access

Optimizing Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation in Data-Scarce Regions Using ERA5 Reanalysis and Machine Learning

View Full Paper
ETEmre TuncaVNVáclav NovákPŠPetr Šařec

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance the estimation of reference evapotranspiration in data-limited regions using ERA5 reanalysis and machine learning models.
  • Utilized daily meteorological data from 33 stations in Turkey (1981–2010)
  • Trained and validated three machine learning models: Random Forest, XGBoost, and ELM
  • Performed quality control on ground-based observations and spatial correlation with ERA5-Land grids
  • Evaluated model performance under various data-limited scenarios.
  • ERA5-Land shows high accuracy for solar radiation and temperature data,
  • Wind speed and relative humidity exhibited systematic biases in the data,
  • XGBoost achieved R2 of 0.95, RMSE of 0.43 mm day−1, and MAE of 0.30 mm day−1, indicating superior performance.

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in data-scarce regions by integrating ERA5-Land reanalysis data with machine learning (ML) models. Daily meteorological data from 33 stations across Turkey’s diverse climate zones (1981–2010) were utilized to train and validate three ML models: Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM). The methodology involved rigorous quality control of ground-based observations, spatial correlation of ERA5-Land grids to station locations, and performance evaluation under various data-limited scenarios. Results indicate that while ERA5-Land provides highly accurate solar radiation (Rs) and temperature (T) data, variables like wind speed (U2) and relative humidity (RH) exhibit systematic biases. Among the used models, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.43 mm day−1, and MAE = 0.30 mm day−1) and computational efficiency. This study provides a robust, regionally calibrated framework that corrects reanalysis biases using ML, offering a reliable alternative for ETo estimation in areas where local measurements are insufficient for sustainable water management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tunca et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730eabc8125b09b0d1e864https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020253
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper