Abstract Background Background P 0.001) and preoperative albumin 35 g/L (OR 2.095, 95% CI 1.160-3.785; P = 0.014). In contrast, preoperative EEN (OR 0.338, 95% CI 0.188-0.610, P 0.001) and early postoperative prophylactic biologic therapy (OR 0.503, 95% CI 0.304-0.832, P = 0.007) were associated with a reduced risk. Histopathological predictors included moderate-to-severe lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the lamina propria (OR 4.924, 95% CI 2.028-11.957, P 0.001) and lymphangiectasia (OR 4.916, 95% CI 2.395-10.092, P 0.001). A prediction model integrating clinical and pathological variables (AUROC 0.829) outperformed the clinical-only model (AUROC 0.715, P = 0.001). Conclusion Conclusions: In the era of biologics and perioperative optimization, the 6-12-months ePOR rate in CD patients was 24.9%. A combined clinical-pathological model showed strong predictive performance, but external validation is warranted to confirm its clinical applicability. References: 1. Buisson A, Chevaux JB, Allen PB, Bommelaer G, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Review article: the natural history of postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(6):625-33 2. Nguyen GC, Loftus EJ, Hirano I et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on the Management of Crohn’s Disease After Surgical Resection. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):271-275 3. De Cruz P, Kamm MA, Hamilton AL et al. Crohn’s disease management after intestinal resection: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9976):1406-17 Conflict of interest: Mr. Hu, Fan: No conflict of interest Huang, Zicheng: No conflict of interest Zhu, Liangru: No conflict of interest Cao, Qian: No conflict of interest Guo, Hong: No conflict of interest Fu, Yu: No conflict of interest Huang, Lingjie: No conflict of interest Xiang, Lingya: No conflict of interest Chao, Kang: No conflict of interest Wang, Chao: No conflict of interest Gao, Xiang: No conflict of interest Chen, Minhu: No conflict of interest
Hu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: