PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Classifying effluxable versus non-effluxable compounds using a permeability threshold based on fundamental energy constraints

View Full Paper
SKSoné KotzeKGKai‐Uwe GossAEAndrea Ebert

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a threshold for passive membrane permeability to predict active efflux of compounds in drug development.
  • Derived a permeability threshold from cellular energy limitations.
  • Conducted a literature review of efflux ratios in MDCKII cells.
  • Analyzed concentration-dependent measurements on selected compounds.
  • Re-evaluated literature ER values against reliable Pm values.
  • Performed MDCK efflux assays for new measurements.
  • Established a permeability threshold of Pm×Cext = 10−1.7 cm/s×µM.
  • Reclassified compounds, identifying all but three outliers in efflux activity.
  • About 60% of compounds without significant efflux activity fell above the permeability threshold.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Predicting whether a compound is subject to active transport is crucial in drug development. We propose a simple threshold for passive membrane permeability (Pm), derived from the cell’s energy limitation, to identify compounds unlikely to be actively effluxed. Results: By considering fundamental cellular energy constraints, our approach provides a mechanistic rationale for why compounds with very high passive permeability in combination with low applied concentration will not undergo active efflux. This moves beyond the empirical observation (such as in previous systems that associate fast-permeating, poorly soluble compounds with low transporter activity) by grounding the prediction in the cell’s energetic limitations. For MDCK (Madin–Darby canine kidney) cells, this threshold—normalized to the applied compound concentration (Cext)—was determined to be Pm×Cext = 10−1.7 cm/s×µM. Methods: To derive this threshold, we conducted an extensive analysis of literature-reported efflux ratios (ERs) in MDCKII cells overexpressing efflux transporters (MDR1, BCRP, MRP2; 294 datapoints across 136 unique compounds). Concentration-dependent measurements for Amprenavir, Eletriptan, Loperamide, and Quinidine—chosen because these borderline compounds exhibited the highest Pm×Cext while still being actively effluxed—enabled the most accurate determination of the threshold. Literature ER values were re-evaluated through the experimental determination of reliable Pm values, as well as newly measured ER values with MDCK efflux assays. Conclusions: The results of these assays and the re-evaluation allowed us to reclassify all but three outliers (compounds with ER > 2.5 and log(Pm×Cext) > −1.7). In contrast, more than 60% of the compounds analyzed without significant ER values (123 compounds) fell above the threshold, in strong agreement with our theory of an energy limitation to active transport. This permeability threshold thus provides a simple and broadly applicable criterion to identify compounds for which active efflux is energetically not feasible and may serve as a practical tool for early drug discovery and optimization, pending further validation in practical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kotze et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f18c8125b09b0d1ed57https://doi.org/10.25673/121913
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper