PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026International Journal of Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy

View Full Paper
JYJinsheng YuMZMinqi ZhuYZYiwen Zhu

Key Points

  • To determine whether NSCLC targeted therapies exhibit common class toxicities or unique drug-specific adverse effects.
  • Analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports from 2004-2025.
  • Evaluated 14 FDA-approved targeted agents across five classes of TKIs.
  • Standardized adverse events to MedDRA preferred terms.
  • Defined safety signals using four disproportionality methods and performed network analysis.
  • Analyzed data from 34,948 individuals with varying signal counts per drug.
  • EGFR-TKIs associated with mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal adverse events.
  • ALK-TKIs linked to metabolic issues and cardiac abnormalities.
  • No single adverse event was common across all drugs; however, certain events appeared recurrently across classes.

Abstract

Background: Whether targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) share mechanism-driven class toxicities or mainly exhibit drug-specific risks remains unclear in real-world practice. Methods: We analyzed reports from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2004–2025) for 14 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents across five classes: EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and a KRAS G12C inhibitor. Adverse events (AEs) were standardized to MedDRA v27.0 preferred terms (PTs). Primary PT-level safety signals were defined based on concordance across four disproportionality methods: proportional reporting ratio (PRR; PRR ≥ 2, x 2 ≥ 4, and ≥3 reports), reporting odds ratio (ROR; lower 95% confidence interval bound ROR 025 > 1), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; IC 025 > 0), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; EB05 ≥ 2). Cross-drug structure was evaluated via a Jaccard-based similarity network. Results: Among 34 948 individuals, per-drug signal counts ranged from 3 to 113. EGFR-TKIs were enriched for mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal events; ALK-TKIs for metabolic and laboratory abnormalities and selected cardiac findings; and RET-TKIs for hepatotoxicity and hypertension. Osimertinib showed prominent electrocardiographic signals (e.g., QT prolongation); lorlatinib exhibited a distinctive dyslipidemia signature. Brigatinib and crizotinib aligned with creatine kinase elevation and visual effects, respectively. No single PT occurred across all 14 drugs. Recurrent cross-class PTs included increased blood pressure, QT prolongation, dry skin, and edema. The similarity network revealed tight within-class modules (EGFR, ALK), a binary RET pair, and peripheral placement of repotrectinib and adagrasib, indicating limited overlap of their AE profiles. Conclusion: This first NSCLC-focused FAERS comparison integrating four-method signal detection with network analysis delineates reproducible class effects superimposed by drug-specific toxicities. Findings support tailored monitoring (e.g., dermatologic care for EGFR-TKIs; ECG/electrolytes for osimertinib; lipid/CK surveillance for ALK-TKIs; blood pressure/liver testing for RET-TKIs) to inform risk-aware first-line decisions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f34c8125b09b0d1f137https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000004704
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper